World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Immorality and Morality of Euthanasia


Article # : 11461 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 4 / 1994  1,197 Words
Author : An Interview With Monsignor Robert Paul Mohan

       The following interview was conducted by THE WORLD & I editor Robert Selle with Monsignor Robert Paul Mohan, professor emeritus of philosophy at Catholic University in Washington, D.C.
       
       The World & I: How do you feel about the ethics of doctor-assisted suicide and other versions of voluntary active euthanasia, in which a patient who is terminally ill or in a state of enormous pain or suffering asks that his life be ended by lethal injection or some similar means?
       
       Monsignor Robert Paul Mohan: The ethical prohibition of taking life extends to voluntary active euthanasia, whether it is assisted or not.
       
       You mentioned that some patients are in "enormous pain" and that this becomes a justification for euthanizing them. But when patients are in great pain, it implies bad pain management by their physicians in most cases.
       
       I have a quote here from an article by Dr. Ira Bycock, the ethics chairman of the Academy of Hospice Physicians. He says,
       
       The requisite knowledge, medicines, and technology exist for the palliation of pain to alleviate the distress of dying. Physicians who do not aggressively respond to the anguish among their dying patients deserve the sternest professional sanctions. As a doctor who has been involved in hospice care for more than fourteen years, I can state without equivocation that the physical sources of suffering associated with dying all can be controlled. Most often such symptoms as pain, shortness of breath, and nausea yield to routine evaluation and straightforward intervention. Even the pain of end-stage cancer commonly can be managed with oral medication.
       
       So the point is that a patient's "enormous pain," far from being a reason for euthanizing him, is a clarion call for better pain management.
       
       W&I: What about the question of whether excruciating suffering of an emotional or mental nature can be a reasonable justification for active euthanasia?
       
       Mohan: I find such a justification very troubling. There's such a broad range of mental and emotional suffering among humanity! If society accepts such suffering as a valid reason for terminating human life, then it could very well be a foot in the door to a much more lax policy somewhere
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy