World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Keep the Mothers at Home


Article # : 11237 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 9 / 1993  3,110 Words
Author : Theresa Funiciello
Theresa Funiciello went from being a homeless welfare mother to an organizer of other welfare mothers, then a special assistant to the commissioner of New York State's Department of Social Services and an adviser to the New York State legislature. She is the author of Tyranny of Kindness: Dismantling the Welfare System to End Poverty in America (Atlantic Monthly Press, 1993).

       THE DREAM AND THE NIGHTMARE
       The Sixties' Legacy to the Underclass
       Myron Magnet
       William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1993
       
       A locker-room mentality dominates the spirit of many contemporary discourses on poverty and welfare in America. Intellectual jocks bandy loose talk about women (and some men) as lesser beings, subject to odd sexual whims and antisocial behaviors and, more generally, as so many objects for experiment. Facts need not get in the way--they can be (and are) marshaled to suit the moment. Myron Magnet's The Dream and the Nightmare is no exception. In his chapter on "Victimizing the Poor," he cites twenty-six "real" men (and one fictional [man]) as evidentiary elements of his central argument that poor people have been victimized by being said to have been victimized. Not a single female is called upon to prove a point. Yet the chapter is largely about people on welfare--94 percent of whom are single mothers and their children.
       
       This is disturbing for a number of reasons, not the least of which is Magnet's tendency to make short shrift of the facts. For instance, early in the book, he implies that individual benefits have increased by noting that "means-tested welfare spending rose 44 percent between 1980 and 1987." This is a stretch, since cash assistance in the form of welfare payments through Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) has steadily fallen in constant dollars since 1970. AFDC payments in no state even reach the poverty line, according to the House Ways and Means Committee. Some means-tested programs have soared--like Medicaid. But these are dollars that go to doctors and other health care professionals to pay for the care largely of poor elderly people--not money that goes to poor families for subsistence. Folding Medicaid and similar programs into the overall numbers is disingenuous, at the very least. If one were to take them seriously, poor people who are hospitalized for six months would be rich. Magnet, unfortunately, does few of his own calculations, relying on data culled from others who often calculate with clear political motivation.
       
       If it were true that AFDC (welfare) benefits had increased, then some credibility could be attached to Magnet's claims that welfare mothers opt for the dole over the wage labor market, even when "work will normally lift people out of poverty." By work, of course, he means only labor that is performed in exchange for a wage. Then again, if Magnet had been doing his own homework, he would know that most single mothers
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy