World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Return of Big Labor


Article # : 21902 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1993  2,834 Words
Author : Charles W. Baird
Charles W. Baird is professor of economics and director of the Smith Center for Private Enterprise Studies at California State University in Hayward.

       Candidate Bill Clinton ran as a "new Democrat" who would steer his party away from the failed liberal policies of the past. By now it is clear he did not mean a word of it. President Clinton plans to relegitimize and enlarge government, and to sacrifice the interests of the majority of private-sector workers to the interests of the AFL-CIO.
       
       While his plan "to grow" the government has been widely publicized and criticized, his equally destructive labor policy initiatives have hardly been noticed. George Stephanopoulos, Clinton's communications director, says: "The president wants to improve relations with labor and with workers throughout the country." Although 88.5 percent of private-sector workers are union-free, Clinton wants to convert the Department of Labor into the Department for Unions.
       
       RESCISSIONS
       
       Late in his term, President Bush issued three executive orders that displeased Big Labor. Clinton has rescinded them.
       
       Beck rights. In 1988 the Supreme Court in the Beck case ruled that unions may not use workers' forced dues for anything other than collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment, and not for lobbying, political advocacy, or organizing unorganized workers if the workers did not want them to. The dissenting workers in Beck received a refund equal to 79 percent of the dues they had been forced to pay since 1976.
       
       In April 1992 Bush issued an executive order to ensure that federally contracted employees know their rights under Beck. Candidate Clinton said Beck was a "fair decision." President Clinton says: "The effect of this order was distinctly antiunion as it did not require contractors to notify workers of any of their other rights protected by the NLRA [National Labor Relations Act], such as the right to organize and bargain collectively."
       
       What a fig leaf! NLRA rights are well known by all workers, especially those already unionized, at whom Bush's order was aimed. Beck rights, however, are new. Very few workers have ever heard of them, and unions are trying to keep workers in the dark. Clinton's rescission serves the union bosses well.
       
       In 1992 the Department of Labor changed two reporting forms unions must submit under the 1959 Landrum-Griffin Act. The changes required unions to report their expenditures
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy