World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Diversity and a Common Education: An Essay on "Can 'Education' be Defined?"


Article # : 10545 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 1 / 1993  5,089 Words
Author : Elliott Wright
Elliott Wright consults and writes on the topics of education, religion, and race. The former senior vice president of the National Conference of Christians and Jews, he designed "This is My Constitution," the basic civic education program marketing the two hundredth anniversary of the U.S. Constitution in 1987.

       Visiting Prague in the summer of 1990, I stood one evening in a handsome room dating from the Masaryk era as a midlevel official of Vaclav Havel's eight-month-old government explained to me the promise of the new republic. "We will have a democratic society based on a free market economy, a capitalist system, that avoids the mistakes you have made in the West," he declared in tones at once reverent and passionate. "We will not have the injustice and poverty you allow in the United States."
       
       "How?" I asked, no doubt displaying my American pragmatism and also betraying my limited experience of Bohemian patriotism.
       
       "Education."
       
       The occasion, a reception for an international delegation of human relation specialists, gave me no chance to explore the educational theory and strategy he expected would deliver the perfect society. I was never sure that the man had any particular plan in mind; rather, he seemed to be positing as an axiom his conviction that his nation, perhaps any people, freed from totalitarianism would learn and live by the highest human ideals.
       
       I thought of the man in Prague as I contemplated T.S. Eliot's 1950 lecture series on education. Like Eliot, the Czech was a utilitarian. He understood education and its definition more in terms of purpose or content. He had dealt with one of the main issues that Eliot said is essential in attempting to define education, namely, What is it for? The what, to the official, was speedy realization of prosperous, equitable democracy capitalism. Unlike Eliot, the Czech showed little awareness that educational purpose is culturally induced, conditioned not only by hope (that is, goals) but also by history and context.
       
       While I have not been back to Prague, I have listened intently to American and western European colleagues who have become directly or indirectly engaged in the reformulation of societies "after the change" in Czech lands and other parts of central and eastern Europe. The reports make it clear that prosperity and democracy are daunting goals, made more difficult to achieve by the revival of old tribalisms. Some of the educational challenges pertain to the pace and models for new systems meant to replace those constructed to Marxist specifications. Others concern the roles of a democratic government and of formerly established religions in the operation of schools. Another set of issues focuses on a philosophy suitable for comprehending and participating in a world of
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy