World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Who Are the Mexican Americans?


Article # : 10265 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 12 / 1993  2,140 Words
Author : Daniel James
Daniel James has written extensively on Cuba. He is the author of Cuba: First Soviet Satellite in the Americas and Che Guevara: a Bibliography, and editor-translator of The Complete Bolivian Diaries of Che Guevara and Other Captured Documents.

       MEXICAN AMERICANS
       The Ambivalent Minority
       Peter Skerry
       New York: The Free Press, 1993
       463 pp., $27.95
       
       Few writers have displayed the courage to treat as candidly as has Peter Skerry the very delicate and complicated subject of the Mexican-American population in relation to society and, in particular, to such putative rivals as African Americans. He has not pulled any punches in his criticism of Mexican-American leaders, who have hitherto enjoyed an immunity from rigorous examination rare in America's tumultuous politics.
       
       Skerry's thesis is that "Mexican Americans are being seduced by the new American political system into adopting the not entirely appropriate, divisive, and counterproductive stance of a racial minority group." The fundamental decision to go "racial" was made not by the Mexican-American community Skerry emphasizes, but by a handful of self-appointed leaders who lack a grass-roots following. They did so because, emulating their black counterparts, they believed that that was the best way to take advantage of federal largesse offered through legislation such as the 1965 Voting Rights Act--the key to the power and influence they have since acquired.
       
       The "strongest institutional expression of the racial minority view of Mexican Americans," the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), is, in fact, a replica of the NAACP's Legal Defense and Educational Fund. MALDEF was not created by Mexican Americans and was not a response to their needs. It was established by that arch representative of WASPish noblesse oblige, the Ford Foundation, whose president, McGeorge Bundy, deliberately modeled it on the NAACP group in the belief that Mexican Americans were about in the same position as blacks a quarter-century earlier with respect to civil rights. Bundy's analogy seemed to imply that Mexican Americans were, like the blacks, an aggrieved racial minority thus (perhaps unwittingly) paving the way for MALDEF's future role in so defining Mexican Americans. The late President Kennedy's former national security adviser, Bundy dispatched MALDEF on its mission in 1968 with a $2.2 million grant.
       
       The "striking difference" between the two organizations, however, is that MALDEF unlike its NAACP model, "has never been a membership organization [and] has no mass membership base among Mexican Americans." Furthermore, Skerry
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy