World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Introduction: Death of a Reading Culture?


Article # : 10217 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 8 / 1993  491 Words
Author : Editor

       Reading presupposes writing. Or does it? When we read we somehow elicit the meaning of words and what they signify; this is done according to rules that can be quite consciously formulated, even if for most people and for much of the time they reside only in habits.
       
       Can the same be said of what is read? While writing is also carried out by formal rules, either explicitly or implicitly in habits, we read many things that were not intentionally set down for scrutiny. The Pawnee scout, the Baker Street detective, the particle physicist, and the geneticist, all read what they choose to take as signs, but none of them claim that what they read is writing, that what they read is a text deliberately and intentionally left for them. And yet Galileo said that the book of Nature is written in the language of mathematics. Is this to be taken literally or metaphorically?
       
       The arts or skills of writing and reading, the arts of literacy, convey to their possessors the power to give and take meaning. But these powers, when elaborated, are not confined to the relation between text and writer, or text and author. It also extends to the relation between writer and reader, and beyond them to a whole pattern of social organization that literacy requires and also makes possible.
       
       If the social organization changes, then so will the means and mode of communication; if literacy--the recently dominant mode of communication--changes, then so will the social organization that is both its result and support, as Alvin Kernan dramatically points out in the first of our essays. We are going through a transition from a literary culture to a culture based upon visual and oral modes. This must, of necessity, bring with it social disturbances as new technology creates sources of new power and redistribution of old power. The literary culture is by no means dead, but we do not yet understand the full scope of the changes to come nor our own proper response to them.
       
       Martin Mueller, in our second essay, brings together the ethical and the intellectual in his fiction of the person-text and putting the self second. And he discusses how the absence of the person of the author is the source of both textual strength and weakness.
       
       The final essay is a most interesting case study of how reading was used and understood in Renaissance and Elizabethan times. Anthony Grafton displays both the ways in which reading has been understood and practiced and the growth of a new academic
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy