World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Black Victimhood: A 'Paradoxical Sequel' to Civil Rights


Article # : 10121 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 4 / 1993  5,126 Words
Author : Anne Wortham
Anne Wortham is associate professor of sociology at Illinois State University. Part II of this article will be published in a subsequent issue.

       Most blacks have been direct or indirect victims of racial prejudice and discrimination. Most can cite circumstance in their lives or in those people they know that have been influenced by racial injustice and by attitudes that reflect responses to it. Much of black history has been characterized by efforts to redress the injustice of racial subordination. Since the mid-1950a however, there has existed with in the black community a concerted effort by individuals and groups to transform their victimization into a political advantage--to institutionalize it as a cultural symbol of moral and political status. This article will examine the nature of that transformation and its attack on individual liberty, individual responsibility, and equality before the law.
       
       As this essay is a critical examination of black victimhood, it is necessary to stress at the outset that this is not an attempt either to deny or diminish the victimization of blacks. My aim is to draw the lines of distinction between actual victims and symbolic victims and illustrate how the latter group's beliefs and attitudes, which I refer to as the stance of victimhood, threaten the values necessary for the relief of those disadvantaged by racial discrimination. Its prominence in the public discourse on justice and equality is, to use historian C. Vann Woodward's term, one of the several "paradoxical sequels" to the successes of the civil rights movement.
       
       THE NATURE OF VICTIMHOOD
       
       A victim is a person who suffers from a destructive or injurious action or agency; he may be deceived or cheated, sacrificed or regarded as sacrificed. Some definitions note that one may be victim of one's own emotions and ignorance. Usually, we think of people as victims of another person's action of some impersonal, external agency or force beyond their control, such as catastrophes, accidents, physical handicaps or illness, psychological or physical abuse, or political and social injustice.
       
       Unlike actual victimization, the stance of victimhood is a technique of self-presentation and impression management that involves the symbolic elaboration of actual victim status. Because symbolic elaborations equality of conceptualization and not concrete reality, one need not be an actual victim to make an implicit or explicit claim to victim status. Whether he actually has experienced injustice or not, the symbolic victim presents himself as the embodiment of all the real imagined suffering of his member ship group as a whole. The symbolic victim asks us to ignore the fact that he is not an actual
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy