World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Can the UN Do the Job?


Article # : 10105 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1993  1,121 Words
Author : Kenneth L. Adelman
A former director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Kenneth L. Adelman is now vice president of the Institute for Contemporary Studies and coauthor (with Norman Augustine) of The Defense Revolution (ICS Press).

       The first response to any international crisis during the Clinton presidency will be to fling it into the United Nations. That may be the right initial response, but will it turn out right? When Hotspur's cousin boasted (in Henry IV, part 2) of his ability to "call spirits from the vasty deep," Hotspur snapped back: "Why, so can I, or so can any man; but will they come when you do call for them?"
       
       Likewise, the toss-it-to-the-UN response may be fine in theory but unlikely to work fine in practice. That is mainly because the United Nations itself is fine in theory but not so in practice. For the Clinton administration to expect the United Nations to carry the load traditionally borne by the major powers would be as Samuel Johnson once quipped about second marriage--a triumph of hope over experience.
       
       That includes a half-century of experience. That may not be fair, since the first 45 years of UN ineffectiveness can be attributed to the superpower standoff. Yet, that standoff having stood down, the United Nations' deliverable goods have not been plentiful.
       
       One need not take just my word for it, though I struggled mightily to make the United Nations more effective from 1981 to 1983, as Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick's deputy. Ours was a quixotic and disheartening quest.
       
       Rather, take the word of those toiling for the United Nations in the world's hot spots today. Ambassador Ismat Kittani, the UN special representative, on his very first day in Somalia criticized the poor job that UN special agencies had done there. Kittani was appointed because his predecessor, Algerian envoy Mohamed Sahnoun, had complained even more vehemently about the turtlelike pace of UN activities. He was dismissed for his sentiments, on target though they were.
       
       Meanwhile, in ex-Yugoslavia the disaster is as wrenching. Though the United Nations has mounted the largest peacekeeping and aid operation in its history, the effort has been as botched as has been UN diplomacy.
       
       'EXTRAORDINARILY SLOW'
       
       Again, one need not just take my word for it. Even mild-man-nered and mild-worded Cyrus Vance, onetime U.S. secretary of state and now UN special mediator on Yugoslavia, deplored the United Nations' latest military deployment for being "extraordinarily slow."
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy