World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

One, Two, Many Crises


Article # : 10104 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1993  1,602 Words
Author : Jed C. Snyder
Jed C. Snyder is a senior research fellow at the Washington office of the National Strategy Information Center, where he is directing a project on "New Approaches to Transatlantic Security." He served in the State Department during the first Reagan administration, and from 1984 to 1987 was deputy director of national security studies at the Hudson Institute.

       The list of potential trouble spots around the globe is limited only by one's imagination. With that caveat, three sets of problem areas and issues are briefly sketched below. In each case, absence of strong U.S. leadership could likely ignite a crisis: (1) Bosnia and Balkan security, (2) the former Soviet Union, and (3) weapons proliferation and Middle Eastern stability.
       
       THE BALKANS
       
       Proclaimed as the first major failure of the Western nations to stop a hemorrhage in the post-Cold War era (Desert Storm was the first post-Cold War crisis effectively handled by the allies), the continuing carnage in the former Yugoslav federation has raised concerns about the threshold for human suffering, political injustice, and attempted genocide. The grade question is: Should alarmed nations interfere in a conflict that diplomatically is a classic example of a civil (internal) war.
       
       The conflict first in Slovenia, then in Croatia, and now in Bosnia, ceased to be an internal matter, however, when it created the largest refugee situation in the postwar period. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees estimates that more than 2.5 million people have been displaced by the fighting in the former Yugoslavia, with nearly 600,000 fleeing to neighboring countries (Germany alone has taken in more than 235,000). While precise estimates of casualties are not known, more than 50,000 have perished over the last two years.
       
       The genesis of this horrendous war is the determination of the Serbs, led by President Slobodan Milosevic, to control as much territory of the former Yugoslav state as possible, regardless of the cost in human life. While it is true that all sides to this conflict--Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, and Muslims--have committed atrocities, a broad spectrum of observers state that the Serbs have shed the most blood, and recent statements by Serb leaders that such crimes have stopped are patently false. Former Polish Prime Minister Tadeusz Mazowiecki concluded that in Bosnia the bulk of rape, forced evacuation, and murder was still being committed by Serbs against Muslims.
       
       In an effort to stop the bloodshed, the European Community and the United Nations are cosponsoring a peace plan, negotiated by former British Foreign Minister Lord David Owen (the EC emissary) and former American Secretary of State Cyrus Vance (the US envoy). The Vance-Owen plan calls for the establishment of 10 canton-like semi-autonomous provinces within the current state of Bosnia
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy