World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Lift the Ban on Gays in the Military?: Accepting Reality


Article # : 10097 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1993  2,444 Words
Author : James T. Bush
Capt. James T. Bush retired from the U.S. Navy and is associate director of the Center for Defense Information.

       What can President Clinton do to fulfill his promise to allow gays and lesbians in the military? What will happen if he keeps this promise?
       
       The noisy debate on these two questions has been long on emotion and short on substance. The primary reason for this is that there is a confusion between the laws that punish homosexual conduct in the military and the administrative ban on homosexuality (more properly, homosexual preference) issued by the Department of Defense (DOD). The laws have been on the books since the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) was adopted in 1951, but the administrative ban has been in effect only since 1982. Clinton cannot change the laws, only Congress can do that, but he can cancel the administrative directive. While there will undoubtedly be staunch resistance, the time has come for the military to accept this change.
       
       BACKGROUND
       
       Two articles in the UCMJ apply specifically to homosexuals. Article 125 states: "Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy." The other is Article 134, referred to as the general article because it bans "conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline." Military lawyers indicate that Article 134 specifically bans some acts such as "indecent acts with another" and "soliciting another to commit an offense." Both these articles prohibit conduct, not thought or preference.
       
       Persons charged under these articles may be subject to a court-martial where they will be protected by constitutional guarantees with regard to due process of the law. A person found guilty of violating these articles can receive punishments that include fines, confinement, and a punitive discharge. There are two punitive discharges, a dishonorable discharge and a bad conduct discharge.
       
       The DOD policy directive banning homosexual preference as well as homosexual conduct was issued in 1982. It states in part:
       
       Homosexuality is incompatible with military service. The presence in the military environment of persons who engage in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrate their propensity to engage in homosexual conduct, seriously impair the accomplishment of the military mission.
       
       Under this policy
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy