World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Middle East Peace Process: Steady as She Goes


Article # : 20628 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 10 / 1992  3,736 Words
Author :
Ted Smith is a professor of journalism at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia.

       THE WORLD & I: How will the change in governments in Israel affect the Medical East and the peace process?
       
       Robert Neumann: Quite considerably. It's clear now that former Prime Minister Shamir never intended to have a peace proves. The whole thing was designed primarily to delay and in the meantime to push forward the settlements of Israelis in the occupied territories.
       
       Now with Prime Minister Rabin and the Labor coalition, the unwillingness of the Israeli government to accommodate any form of territorial change has disappeared; there is now a readiness to accommodate. The question is whether an interim autonomy can be achieved and be made sufficiently meaningful to the Palestinian people.
       
       Leon Hadar: I agree that you have now a government in Israel that, as Dr. Neumann suggested, is committed to a peace and security for land formula, as opposed to the previous government, which was committed to or supported a very messianic, religious, nationalistic agenda. There is also a major difference in terms of the short-term and long-term goals of those two governments.
       
       Even more important is what this election reflects as far as the Israeli public is concerned. The Israeli public gave a mandate both to Robin and to this new government to move toward peace. It is clear that the Israeli electorate rejected the greater Israel agenda of the Likud government, and with the majority that he enjoys in the Knesset, Rabin should feel very comfortable now to move forward and implement a more moderate agenda.
       
       Clearly this is the most dovish government in Israel's history. You have together with the Meretz members, 30 and even more coalition members who support not only land for peace, but actually support negotiations with the PLO and the establishment of a Palestinian state. This is clearly a major development.
       
       You should had a major defeat for the greater Israel agenda. This was symbolized by the total defeat of the Trieth Party, which in many ways reflected the coalition between the religious right and the secular nationalist right.
       
       Rabin should feel very comfortable now moving toward peace, making major concessions. I think you have even more than that. You have an interesting demographic coalition of Russian Jews, Ashkenazi, liberal Jews, young people., and even some of the
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy