World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

What's Right and Wrong With U.S. Health Care


Article # : 20341 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 6 / 1992  1,746 Words
Author : James A. Rice
James A. Rice is strategy and public affairs officer for HealthSpan Health Systems Corporation in Minneapolis.

       The public policy stage seems finally set to move beyond debate to action within the U.S. health services sector. The scope, nature, and timing of this action, however, remain unclear. What does seem clear, though, is that America's tradition of health care pluralism is under siege, from both the political Right and Left. Fundamental precepts of the American health services sector are being challenged in the election year debates of 1992--challenged in ways that could bring significant changes in the fabric of how we choose to finance and deliver health services, even if no sweeping legislation is promulgated.
       
        America's love affair with choice/pluralism
       
        In the U.S. health care experience, one concept, one overarching goal, seems to be simultaneously (a) shaped by the unique American psyche, and (b) shaping the policy debate for health sector reform--pluralistic choice. Choice of physicians, choice of benefits, choice of hospitals, choice in the mix of health insurance deductibles versus premiums, choice of life and death, choices about which level of government and what degree of government is needed in the U.S. health services sector. We pride ourselves on our will and capacity to make available a cornucopia of choices in all facets of our society: clothes, cars, houses, foods, friends, and even theology. It has become clear, however, that not all segments of society have equitable access to these choices. This has become a central issue in the debate being waged over health sector reform: how to afford enhanced access for all people to available U.S. health care choices?
       
        This political, and particularly economic, realities at the close of the 1990s will severally constrain these prerogatives. There will be fewer choices for all of us. Prerogatives of physicians, hospitals, politicians, payers, employees, and patients will be more limited. America's health care pluralism is, and will increasingly be, under siege.
       
        What are our current health sector resources?
       
        The U.S. health sector is one of the largest single components of our economy. It represents the largest and one of the faster growing blocs of employees; and it leverages economic growth and vitality in the broader economy through its consumption of various goods, services, utilities, food, and a wide array of computer and electronic technologies. The government's role has been steadily increasing since the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid in the
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy