World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Hegelianism and the Curriculum: The Educational Philosophy of William Torrey Harris


Article # : 19926 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 4 / 1992  3,371 Words
Author : Stephen J. Sneigoski
Stephen J. Sniegoski is a historian with the U.S Department of Education

       Much concern is expressed today about students' lack of academic knowledge. A number of recent best-selling books have focused on this subject, including E.D. Hirsch's Cultural Literacy and Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind. Chester E. Finn, former assistant secretary of education under William J. Bennett, and current Assistant Secretary of Education Diane Ravitch authored What Do Our Seventeen-Year-Olds Know, which found that students know very little indeed in the subjects of geography, history, and literature.
       
        This current concern about academic content goes against the conventional educational thinking of most of the twentieth century. Academic content had been relegated to the background for a number of reasons. First, john Dewey redefined education to mean the fostering of thinking, which he radically distinguished from the transmission of knowledge. Second, the idea that schools must deal with all manner of knowledge that possessed social utility--family living, sex, auto safety, health, vocational training-squeezed the amount of time available for academic material. Furthermore, numerous educators emphasized that the curriculum should appeal to children, a most children regard academic subjects as boring. Moreover, since such academic subjects are difficult and cannot be mastered by everyone, egalitarian educationists rejected them as elitist.
       
        Some object that by transmitting knowledge of the past, academics fail to indoctrinate children with current ideas of social reform, which some educators regard as the sine qua non of education. In fact, in some quarters, traditional academic teachings are perceived a s opposed to social change because they provide ideas that are currently deemed racist or sexist. All of this is not to say that academic subjects have ever been completely abandoned in America's schools: They have remained, to some degree, and this despite, not because of, the ideas of leading twentieth-century educationists.
       
        William Torrey Harris
       
        In the nineteenth century, however, things were different. The educational establishment openly championed the academic nature of the schools. And the individual who best provided the philosophical rationale for this academic orientation was William Torrey Harris.
       
        Although little remembered now, Harris was the dominant figure in education in the latter part of the nineteenth century, a period during which American public education underwent
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy