World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

After the August Revolution, What Next?


Article # : 19624 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 10 / 1991  1,306 Words
Author :
S. Robert Lichter and Linda S. Lichter direct the Center for Media and Public Affairs, a nonprofit media watchdog group in Washington, D.C. Stanley Rothman is a professor of government at Smith College, where he directs the Center for the Study of Social and Political Change.

       THE WORLD & I: How irreversible is the August revolution?
       
        Henry Gordon: The sooner Yeltsin removes the old bureaucrats from local levels, the more successful reform can be. As far as it being irreversible, I don't think so.
       
        W&I: What effect will the remaining hard-liners within the bureaucracy have on the future of Soviet reforms?
       
        Gordon: It is hard to assess the threat. They are there. And they will retreat to the cellar. They will not stand up and say we are against this or that. But when special regulations come from the Russian government to the provinces, they will do their best to stop the Russian influence.
       
        Igor Oleynik: I was not in the bureaucracy, but I was very close to it. I never thought democracy could emerge from Soviet market reforms. Bureaucrats are not interested in market reforms. They will do whatever to survive. This is their profession. But the same people, several years ago, were the most flexible people. In areas of privatization, for example, property will be transferred to private companies, but the bureaucrats will become the shareholders. And then they will operate in the same way.
       
        James Millar: First, the people went to the barricades to defend democracy and freedom, not the market economy which offers an uncertain future. Insofar as they know about the market economy, it is very frightening. But since this happened in Eastern Europe such as Poland and Czechoslovakia, they ran the party out completely. In other places such as Bulgaria and Romania, the party made some changes itself. I would guess that in different republics and different regions some people would be able to insinuate themselves into the new reforms and in other places the people will just run them out. That will be very complex. The resistance to economic reform is not just a question of bureaucrats, it is really for everyone. Anyone who surveys what Soviets want knows their expectations are up. Everyone wants K-mart in Moscow, but when you talk about raising prices or losing entitlements like health care, subsidized education, goods, then people are not anxious to lose those. Some people will be better off after reforms, but some will be worse off. It depends on how one compensates that. Here is an opportunity for the leadership to educate the population about what the market will bring, but even Yeltsin is not really ready to tell people about the costs of reform. That is the real test of the new
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy