World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Introduction: Equal Access To Justice?


Article # : 19330 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 6 / 1991  2,247 Words
Author : Albert W. Alschuler
Albert W. Alschuler is Wilson-Dickinson Professor at the University of Chicago Law School.

       The impartial resolution of disputes is a basic social service. It is not a service that our society provides very well. The articles that follow offer glimpses of a justice system in serious trouble.
       
        A central theme of the articles concerned with criminal justice is the power of the prosecutor. In America's criminal justice system, about twenty-five hundred elected prosecutors are, for the most part, answerable only to the voters of their communities. No other legal system in the world affords nearly so much power over life and liberty to essentially unreviewed local prosecutors. Defendants--noting the power that these officials exercise in deciding whether to accuse people of crime, in choosing what charges to file, and in plea bargaining--understand that their cases will be decided by lawyers in courthouse corridors, not by judges and juries in courtrooms. As one defendant remarked, "I feel that a judge really ain't shit, you know. He's just put up there--he's supposed to be the head of the show, but he ain't nothing. The person who runs the show is the prosecutor." Another explained, "The prosecutor is the fellow that gives you the time."
       
        Bennett Gershman's article in this symposium describes several forms of prosecutorial abuse, offers some memorable illustrations, and reveals the inadequacy of current remedies for this misconduct. Among the themes of Stephen Schulhofer's paper on justice and the underclass is how plea bargaining forces indigent defendants "to play by the law of averages and abandon their right to an individualized determination of guilt." Gerald Lefcourt's paper on the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) focuses on defendants at the opposite end of the socioeconomic spectrum. This paper reveals how America has moved toward equal justice for the rich and the poor, not by treating the poor better but by treating the rich worse. (As a card-carrying ACLU member, I take perverse satisfaction in the fact that the Wall Street Journal has become a champion of defendants' rights; in speeches to business groups, an editor of the Journal now defines the "liberal" as "a conservative who's been RICO-ed.")
       
        To be sure, most white-collar defendants are not in the same position as Robert H., a defendant who recently spent six months in an Atlanta jail without any formal charges having been filed against him and without ever appearing in court or seeing a lawyer. On the day that Robert H. met the public defender who represented him, the public defender advised him to plead guilty. Robert's was one of thirty felony cases in which this public defender made court appearances that day--and one
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy