World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Introduction: Sustaining Community


Article # : 18325 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 10 / 1990  4,886 Words
Author : Leroy S. Rouner
Leroy S. Rouner is professor of philosophy, religion and philosophical theology; and director of the Institute for Philosophy and Religion at Boston University. His most recent book is a memoir, The Long Way Home (Langford Books, 1989). In the spring of 1991 Beacon Press will publish his To Be At Home: Christianity, Civil Religion, and World Community.

       Our current quest for community has numerous dimensions. Metaphysically it signals the end of our modern fascination with autonomous individuality as the primary reality and hence the cornerstone of culture. In science the empirical method of exploration sought out the behavior of individual entities, whether stars or atoms. In politics, the rise of the individual eventually produced the commitment to democracy. In economics, free enterprise meant entrepreneurial individualism. And in religion, the individual Protestant rose against Catholic hegemony, thus establishing religious individualism as a major influence in Western culture.
       
        Personally, however, the search for roots and the need for common ground are an admission that individuals who live isolated and autonomous live are struggling, sometimes desperately, to find meaning in the onrush of modern life. My favorite survivor of this onrush is my 96-year-old mother-in-law. She was already a young woman when the first automobile drove past her house in New York City. She has lived through two world wars and the deaths of numerous dearly beloved family members and friends, and has seen astronauts walk on the moon. With a little luck - she is in excellent health - she may live to see the establishment of human colony on Mars.
       
        How does anyone keep his cultural bearings, never mind his sanity and hope, in the midst of what sociologists dryly call this “rapid social change”? My mother-in-law never tires of saying how much family and friends mean to her. So, on the personal level, community is survival.
       
        But politics, lying somewhere between the metaphysical and the personal, is perhaps our most vivid recent experience of the quest for genuine community. The collapse of communist governments in Europe in the autumn of 1989 was not a triumph of individuals in the name of individual freedoms. It was a community protest against false community. Oppressive authoritarianism was rejected as serving the interests of those few individuals who controlled the government. The politics of the new Europe hopes for governments that will really serve “the people.”
       
        How we build and sustain community for “the people” depends on how we understand the nature of the community we need and want. Here recent history is cautioning. The communist governments of Central Europe claimed to speak in the name of “the people” when, in fact, they served only their own interests. “Communism” was supposedly the yearning for community raised to high political art. It turned out to be ideology
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy