World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Oil Embargo: Winners and Losers


Article # : 18308 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 10 / 1990  2,011 Words
Author : Thomas R. Stauffer
Thomas R. Stauffer, a consultant to OPEC and several governments, has taught Middle East politics and energy at Georgetown, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins universities. He is currently writing a book on economic warfare in the Middle East.

       The U.S.-led oil embargo of Iraq and Kuwait implies far-reaching economic repercussions, even without further escalations. Amid this crisis, however, there are both economic winners and economic losers.
       
        So far the embargo is quite simple. The United States has effectively interdicted all significant exports of oil from either Kuwait or Iraq. The U.S. move results in a gross shortfall of about 4 million barrels per day (b/d) of oil, or 17 percent of total OPEC production. The embargo of oil exports is bolstered by a blockade of most imports to both states.
       
        This is a large loss of oil out of the world market. The cutback is comparable with that which triggered a tripling of oil prices in 1979-80. It is also larger than the oil losses that the United States suffered in retaliation for its rescue of Israel during the 1973-74 war. Then, in contrast to the present, the United States was the victim and not the perpetrator of the embargo.
       
        There are two cases to consider. The first is “containment,” meaning there are no further cutbacks in supply and no damage to the fields. The second and much more serious case involves the possibility of international or unintentional escalation. Scenarios could include extension of the oil embargo to Iran if it supports Iraq against their common enemies (the United States and Israel) or if oil fields are damaged or destroyed.
       
        The stakes are enormous, even if the oil cutoff is confined to exports from Iraq and Kuwait. In the worst cast scenario - for example, if the embargo is extended to include Iran or oil-export facilities are destroyed in Saudi Arabia or elsewhere - the stakes skyrocket even higher.
       
        We shall begin by examining the winners and losers in the present scenario - a limited embargo - and then sketch the much more ominous prospects of any escalation.
       
        The losers
       
        All energy consumers are the first and most obvious losers. They suffer categorically because the sudden scarcity of oil, resulting from the throttling of exports from both Iraq and Kuwait, has already precipitated a rapid runup in oil prices. These have jumped from some $14-16 just before the confrontation to $25-27 a fortnight later.
       
       
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy