World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Ukraine: A Quiet Revolution


Article # : 17697 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 6 / 1990  3,117 Words
Author : Taras Hunczak
Taras Hunczak, a professor of history and political science at Rutgers University, is editor of Suchasnist, a Ukrainian monthly published in the United States. He writes frequently on Ukraine affairs.

       What does the future hold for the people of the Ukraine? As is evident with events in Lithuania, the process of change and of national self-assertion will, indeed, be difficult.
       
        The Ukraine, a republic of 52 million people, was subjected to a variety of historical experiences that nearly tore it apart. Except for a brief period of self-rule from 1917 to 1921 (and on limited territory at that), the Ukraine has been under a foreign rule for the last 250 years. The western portion of the Ukraine was rules first by the Poles and, after the first partition of Poland in 1772, by the Austrians. The Ukraine was gradually annexed by Russia which, with its autocratic system, converted an autonomous Ukrainian state into a number of imperial provinces. As a centralist state, the Russian Empire sought to introduce uniformity at the expense of national cultures and languages. The policy of Russification introduced by Peter I remains a landmark of Moscow's approach to the numerous minorities who found themselves within the empire. The Ukrainians were among the victims of this policy.
       
        The Polish and, subsequently, Austrian rule were more benign. Particularly since the middle of the nineteenth century, the Galician Ukrainians were able to develop institutions that provided an organizational framework for their cultural, economic, and, ultimately, political activity. It was essentially within the pluralist system of the Austro-Hungarian Empire that the Western Ukrainians developed a sense of national consciousness and political assertiveness. Hence, the Ukrainians entered the twentieth century divided not only by the borders of the Russian and the Austro-Hungarian empires but, even more importantly, by their knowledge, understanding, and attitude toward their past and, to some extent, their national identity. The Russian Empire, which prohibited even the use of the Ukrainian language and crushed every appearance of Ukrainian political aspiration, largely reduced the Ukrainian population to the status of an ethnic minority.
       
        The events of World War I and its aftermath provided an opportunity for the Ukrainians to express their political aspirations. This they did, establishing Ukrainian governments both on the East and West Ukrainian territories, which on January 22, 1919, were united into one Sovereign Ukrainian Republic. Obviously, the sense of common culture and common historical heritage was stronger than the artificial borders created by the two empires.
       
        When the Bolsheviks conquered the territory and incorporated it into
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy