|
|
|
| Current Issue |
|
|
| Resources |
|
|
|
Let's Keep Good Ties With Egypt
| Article
# : |
17688 |
|
|
Section : |
CURRENT ISSUES
|
| Issue
Date : |
6 / 1990 |
1,970 Words |
| Author
: |
Joseph J. Sisco
Joseph J. Sisco is a former deputy undersecretary of state for
political affairs (1974-76) and partner in Sisco Associates,
an international management consulting firm. |
The past 15 years have seen fruitful and beneficial cooperation between the United States and Egypt. It was President Anwar Sadat who expelled the Soviets; made war against Israel in 1973, primarily to achieve negotiations from a position of relative strength; and steered Egypt toward the United States, in the belief that the route to peace in the Middle East was via Washington.
The results in the Sadat era were striking. Two disengagement agreements between Egypt and Israel in 1974 and 1975 were largely a result of the indispensable third-party role of the United States. These were followed by the Egyptian-Israeli treaty in 1977, brokered by President Jimmy Carter at Camp David. The treaty fundamentally altered the strategic balance in the area, reduced the chances of war, and eliminated as a practical matter the potential exercise of a military option against Israel by Syria alone.
In the ensuing decade, a host of diplomatic, economic, and military cooperative undertakings developed between the United States and Egypt. Next to Israel, Egypt became the no. 1 recipient of U.S. economic and military assistance - in rough terms exceeding $2 billion annually, much of it in grants. The Egyptian-Israeli treaty meant for Israel the elimination of a threat in the Sinai; for Egypt, an opportunity to focus on its own development; and for the United States, enhanced prestige as a major power capable of producing impressive political results if it engaged itself at the highest levels.
This is the high side. But there have also been difficulties.
The Egyptian-Israeli treaty has been maintained relatively unscarred because peace is in the mutual interest of both sides. Normalization remains elusive, however, as long as no comprehensive settlement is achieved.
The peace dividend that so many Egyptians hoped for has fallen short of overly optimistic expectations. While Egypt is holding its own, the population explosion and the numbers of those living on the margin require huge subsidies in order to avoid potentially dangerous political, economic, and social unrest. A swollen, underemployed bureaucracy adds economic burdens. Huge amount of outside assistance are essential, therefore, in an environment of uncertain revenues form oil, tourism, and worker remittances from abroad.
And the momentum toward the comprehensive settlement that Sadat
...
Read Full Article
Look for this article in Ask.com
|
|
