World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The American Revenge


Article # : 17641 

Section : THE ARTS
Issue Date : 6 / 1990  2,033 Words
Author : Kenneth Powell
Kenneth Powell is an architecture writer for the London Daily Telegraph.

       American architects are "threatening London with a rash of quite unsuitable buildings. The revenge of the once rebellious colonies is to undermine our historic capital," Lord St. John of Fawsley has said, in response to the influx of U.S. architects into Britain. It is "an invasion, and one more of Vandals than Goths," says Lord St. John, onetime government minister and now chairman of the powerful Royal Fine Art Commission.
       
        St. John was speaking to an audience consisting largely of British architects, whose professional figurehead, Royal Institute of British Architects President Maxwell Hutchinson, has also expressed concern at thee American "invasion." Hutchinson feels that British firms should receive the commissions that are going to Americans.
       
        'Alien Approach'
       
        Both St. John and Hutchinson, backed by a number of critics, argue that American designers has an alien approach. "Urban design," insists Lord St. John, "is not the American architect's strong point." Americans are used to putting up huge buildings on cleared sites - "If an old building is in the way," he adds, "it is more often than nor torn down to make way for its successor." He has evidently not talked to American developers outflanked by tough landmarking policies. Indeed, his comments are both patronizing and xenophobic. (An American architect working in London observes: "He reminds me of white supremacists back in the sixties who said they had nothing against blacks but world just prefer them to stay in their own areas.")
       
        But why are the activities of American architects in Britain so controversial? Is it just a simple matter of parochial protectionism? It is not hard to see why American firms choose to set up shop in London - one of the world's leading financial centers - which has enjoyed a development boom throughout the eighties. They see it equally as a base for work kin Europe, and recent political events suggests that Moscow, Prague, Warsaw, and Bucharest may soon provide a demand for American expertise in the field of building. The practice of architecture is now international, and British architects are working throughout the world.
       
        To some extent, Americans have been made the scapegoats for a widespread dissatisfaction with the buildings produced by the eighties boom in Britain. The first U.S. firm to establish a serious presence in London was Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM), the largest in the United States and well-known for classic Modernist
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy