World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

South African's Silent Pain


Article # : 17536 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1990  3,735 Words
Author : Nora Beloff
Nora Beloff is a noted British journalist who recently made her first visit to South Africa.

       One dominant impression from a first and extensive exposure to South Africa is of multitudes of people crushed between the brutalities of apartheid, on the one side, and the wretchedness caused by strife and disinvestment, promoted by the antiapartheid African National Congress (ANC), on the other.
       
        The wild welcome accorded to ANC leader Nelson Mandela during his international tours reflects rightful rage against institutionalized racism. Yet pro-Mandela banners, slogans, and T-shirts make no contribution to the real problem facing South African society: How can the country's wealth expand fast enough - and fairly enough - to provide a decent existence for a black population that has tripled since World War II and is now mostly under 24 years old?
       
        The authorities have abolished some of apartheid's worst features, including pass laws, segregated transport, and the ban on interracial marriages. They have not rescinded the iniquitous laws that force blacks to live where whites want them to. In practice, this is either in "townships" outside white towns (where the number of people squeezed in is generally larger than in the original town) or on slabs of land that had been tribal territories and are now misleadingly named "homelands." The oddly shaped boundaries were traced by whites to reserve for themselves the best townships and the richest resources.
       
        Only about half of black workers are regularly employed. Those from the townships spend large parts of their working life commuting to and from their workplaces in white towns. Those from the homelands are expected to desert their families and spend most of the year in single-sex hostels at white farms or factories. The homelands themselves are far too poor to provide a living for their inhabitants.
       
        Most Africans, both urban and rural, live off handouts from their extended families. Under the traditions of communal responsibility, incomes are willingly shared.
       
        Traveling around the country, my photographer and I saw many signs of malnutrition, particularly among children, and this, as hospital workers reminded us, is often fatal. But unlike in many other African countries, nobody was "televisably" starving - and their plight never made the headlines. In contrast to my experiences in other poor countries, I saw few beggars.
       
        The worst conditions were in "squatter camps," shantytowns
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy