|
|
|
| Current Issue |
|
|
| Resources |
|
|
|
When Style Isn't Enough: The Mapplethorpe Case
| Article
# : |
16505 |
|
|
Section : |
THE ARTS
|
| Issue
Date : |
11 / 1989 |
2,361 Words |
| Author
: |
Eric Gibson
Eric Gibson, art critic for the Washington Times, last wrote
on Henry Ossewa Tanner in the September 1991 issue of The
World & I. |
By the time this essay appears in print, the exhibition of Robert Mapplethorpe's photographs on view at the Washington Project for the Arts in the nation's capital will be in Hartford; Senator Jesse Helms' draconian amendment will--or will not--be law; and President Bush's nominee to head the National Endowment for the Arts will no doubt be undergoing a grilling as the price for being confirmed. The cause of the controversy will have moved out of town, but the controversy itself will still be with us.
There was a time when Robert Mapplethorpe's photographs were just that--photographs--works of art around which there circulated shock, often considerable, nut no controversy. His regular exhibitions at the Robert Miller Gallery in New York were no more likely to elicit vituperative reviews than was a show of color-field abstraction. Not that this kind of bland acceptance of such self-consciously charged and provocative work was necessarily the correct one. But now that the pendulum has swung so completely in the opposite direction, it might be useful to banish from our minds the purely political reading of Mapplethorpe's work and try to think of it once again solely in terms of aesthetics.
Inferior Works
The first thing that needs to be stated unequivocally is that the problems Mapplethorpe's work presents as art do not have to do with homosexuality in principle. That is to say that if one finds his photographs inferior as works of art--as this writer does--it does not necessarily follow that it is because they frequently depict homosexual practices nor, as is thought in some more extreme quarters, because the photographer was himself a homosexual. (Mapplethorpe died of AIDS in 1989.)
Their weakness has to do with the way the subject matter is handled rather than the subject matter itself. After all, the English painter Francis Bacon tackles the same topic in certain of his works, yet so far his exhibitions have failed to spark the kind of uproar the Mapplethorpe's did. It has to do, as well, with a rather conventional, if not banal, approach to the aesthetic aspects of his work. In other words, it is on aesthetic grounds, not political ones, that he is found wanting.
This point needs to be made clearly because in the polarized atmosphere of the debate on Mapplethorpe, this kind of subtlety is likely to be the first casualty. And because, just as frequently, homosexual activists read any criticism of Mapplethorpe as a
...
Read Full Article
Look for this article in Ask.com
|
|
