World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Central American Quagmire


Article # : 16447 

Section : EDITORIAL
Issue Date : 5 / 1989  1,058 Words
Author : Morton A. Kaplan
Editor and Publisher

       On February 14, the Central American presidents agreed on a program that would, they said, bring democracy to Nicaragua. This subject is discussed in "The Contras: RIP?" in Currrent Issues this month.
       
        Has the Arias peace plan really succeeded, or is the Contra issue merely being swept under the rug? If the Arias plan has really succeeded, were the opponents of the Contras correct at the outset? Even if Nicaraguan President Ortega was sincere in his conciliatory statements at the meeting of the presidents, it does not necessarily follow that the opponents of the Contras were correct to trust that the Sandinistas would institute reforms if given the opportunity. The Contra war may have been among the factors leading to Ortega's apparent shift in position. Moreover, American policy may play an important role in determining whether a democratic regime emerges in Nicaragua.
       
        Ortega certainly made all the right noises at the meeting of the Central American presidents. However, I do not think that he has suddenly become a convert to democracy, and I believe that he still hates the United States. When he recently told Flora Lewis of the New York Times that his earlier statements that the Sandinistas would never surrender the revolution meant only that they would not permit a return to a Somocista regime, that contradicted the Sandinista regime's conduct of politics in Nicaragua.
       
        On the other hand, Ortega did agree to release Contra prisoners, to permit political parties to organize and campaign, to make legislative reforms, and to accept new elections.
       
        Although less than decisive, these are important concessions. However, official international verification was not accepted. Although appeals to the Inter-American Judicial Commission are possible, the probability that an edict of this tribunal would prove effective is minimal.
       
        Why did Ortega make these concessions? Part of the answer lies in the Honduran pledge to eliminate the Contra camps and in the promise of the other Central American republics not to assist the Contras. Another part of the answer lies in the knowledge that President Reagan's policies so reinforced the criterion of democracy in Nicaragua as a minimum satisfaction of his administration's demands that anything less would have ensured continued American opposition. And Ortega is hoping, as a number of his statements make clear, that President Bush will accept an opportunity to pull back from President Reagan's support of
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy