World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Is Peronism Democratic?


Article # : 16418 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1989  2,073 Words
Author : David C. Jordan
David C. Jordan is professor of Latin American studies at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia.

       On May 14, Argentines are scheduled to go to the polls to elect a new government. Should these elections occur and an orderly transfer of power take place in December, this will be the first time one elected government has succeeded another since Juan D. Peron succeeded himself in 1952.
       
        Most recent public opinion polls show the Peronist Party candidate, Carlos Saul Menem, winning this election over the Radical Party's standard-bearer, Eduardo Angeloz. Since the Radical Party has an established reputation as democratic, most concern for the consolidation of Argentine democracy is expressed over the democratic credentials of the Peronists. The debate over the party's founder, Peron, is probably destined to be a permanent part of Argentina's historiography, but the nature of his party's democratic commitment, now that he is dead, can be tested should Menem win.
       
        Many people had written the Peronists obituary after they lost the 1983 elections to the Raulm Alfonsin-led Radical Party. Peronism was thought to have entered into a severe depression as a result of this defeat. The party was internally fragmented, divided between traditionalists and a renovating wing, and perceived as containing many antidemocratic elements. Now it is poised to win the upcoming elections and carries the main responsibility for continuing the legitimation of Argentine democracy.
       
        There are three major threats to this progress. First, the Menem-led Peronists will inherit an economy from the Alfonsin adminstration that is in even more serious difficulties than the one Alfonsin inherited from the military. Inflation was as high in 1988 (nearly 400 percent) as it was at the end of the 1980-83 period. Industrial GDP is stagnant, and the external debt is $15 billion higher.
       
        There is a consensus among serious economists on the essential steps to be taken. But since Alfonsin was unable to accomplish very much toward privatizing the state enterprise, considerable doubt exits that Menem will be able to do so either, given that this dependence on the labor bureaucracies and populist rhetoric is even greater than Angeloz's. But if Menem is to succeed, he will have to reduce state bureaucracies, encourage exports, reshedule external debt, sell state enterprises, and reduce internal debt. These measures will lead him into direct clashes with vested interests that have been core supporters of the Peronist movement, which is often seen as far more static than democratic in the sense of the regime having more power than society. The democratic ideal, in its regime
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy