World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Pinter Goes Political


Article # : 16253 

Section : THE ARTS
Issue Date : 3 / 1989  2,442 Words
Author : Herb Greer
Herb Greer is an American writer and playwright who lives in Britain and on the Continent.

       If a playwright becomes very, very successful among "serious" people, there comes a point when his work acquires the status described by Tom Wolfe in connection with some types of modern art. That is to say that the explanation becomes as important, if not more important, than the work itself. The plays of Harold Pinter are like this now. It may be that they were always like this. With the exception of a few avant-garde aficionados, the British did not like the plays very much in the fifties when producers began to stage them in London; audiences and critics were often baffled and hostile because--unlike other new playwrights of the time--Pinter seemed to have no emotional or political ax to grind. Those who did like the plays spoke of a "pervading sense of menace" and other vague qualities.
       
        Arbitrary Contempt
       
        There was never anything very mysterious about Pinter's work. He drew short-term theatrical effects out of characters who liked to browbeat or show arbitrary contempt for each other, rather as chimpanzees or apes behave in establishing dominance among a group. Since theater is primarily an emotional ritual depending on short-term effects, this was not a disadvantage. In time the intellectual emptiness of Pinter's work became a positive quality, because it left a sort of vacuum that could be filled by critical and academic speculation and (much more important) chic dinner-table conversation.
       
        This was a great gift to audiences who like to carry a play out of the theater with them. Even Noel Coward acquired a taste for Pinter. He said:
       
        He is at least a genuine original. I don't think he could
        write in any other way if he tried. The Caretaker, on the
        face of it, is everything I hate most in the theater,
        squalor, repletion, lack of action, but somehow it seized
        hold of you … Nothing happiness except that somehow it
        does. The writing is at moments brilliant and quite
        unlike anyone else's.
       
        This real originality was by no means as puzzling as Coward supposed. It is not true that nothing happens in Pinter's plays. The characters are put into various sorts of danger that excite and exploit vicarious feelings of outrage and
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy