World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Gorbachev Stumps in Siberia


Article # : 15983 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1989  1,710 Words
Author : Terry McNeill
Terry McNeill is chairman of the Department of Political Science at the University of Hull in Great Britain.

       The Soviet Far East is the glaring blank spot on the golden Pacific arc. It possesses reserves of fossil fuels that could provide the basis of a range of industries, and if an energy-strapped Japan were to cooperate, Eastern Siberia could become a locomotive point in the Soviet economy. Plans for the development of a new energy complex in the Far East have long been urged. In 1982, scientists at the Novosibirsk Institute of Economics were warning that the output of the Urengoi and Tyumen complexes of Western Siberia was beginning to peak and urged that priority attention be given to the development of the Far East.
       
        The development of the resources and industrial potential of the Far East using the technical assistance of the Pacific states, however, runs into a number of obvious political obstacles. Japan has traditionally been cool toward Soviet overtures for joint projects despite its pressing energy needs, because of unresolved conflicts relating to jurisdiction over the Kuriles. The weight of Soviet military presence in the region has a generally alienating effect, compounded by the previous occupation of Afghanistan and support for Vietnamese imperialism.
       
        Characteristically, Gorbachev has sought to resolve the sticking points. In a major speech delivered in Vladivostok in July 1986, he set the process in motion. At the time the significance of his action was poorly understood. Commentaries on it emphasized the familiarity of his themes, albeit addressed with characteristic Gorbachevian vigor and verve, but with hindsight he can be seen to have broken fresh ground. It was then that he:
       
        ·Took the first steps toward disengagement from Afghanistan, indicated his willingness to pursue political settlements of regional conflicts, and started cutting Soviet regional troop deployments;
       
        ·Stated the USSR's wish to be accepted as a legitimate and cooperative member of the Pacific community, stressing his readiness to engage in responsible discussions on pressing issues of regional security;
       
        ·Adumbrated his ambitions for the Far Eastern zone and invited the participation of neighboring states;
       
        ·Stressed his desire for improved relations with the ASEAN countries; and
       
        ·Signaled his claim to a greater say in the determination of Asian/Pacific regional
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy