World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Stanislavsky on Home Ground


Article # : 15921 

Section : THE ARTS
Issue Date : 7 / 1989  2,629 Words
Author : John Elsom
John Elsom is a contributing editor to The World & I.

       Fifty years after his death, the seminal Russian theater director Konstantin Stanislavsky is still an object of controversy in his native land.
       
        America and the West probably remember Stanislavsky and his innovative "method" system of acting because of the late Lee Strasberg and his celebrated Actors Studio, which helped form the likes of Marlon Brando, Paul Newman, and Marilyn Monroe. Oleg Efremov, current artistic director of the Moscow Art Theater, the company formed by Stanislavsky, recently organized an International Stanislavsky Symposium in Moscow, which brought together five hundred delegates to discuss what the late, great director means to the modern world.
       
        Realism, on stage or off, is never an easy commodity to handle, particularly in Moscow, at a time when glasnost, particularly in the theater, was quite astonishing. As discussions at the symposium progressed and members saw more examples of what currently passes for "truth-telling" in Moscow's theaters, the idea that a common definition of stage realism could be achieved became increasingly remote.
       
        Variations on Chekhov
       
        Members were presented with several different ways of directing Chekhov. The most apparently authentic is still to be found at the Moscow Art Theater, where realism is taken to mean a close imitation of life's surfaces, together with a passionate expression of the characters' inner emotions. It is a style that, with its lack of irony, might be mistaken in the West for overly broad acting. Efremov's version of Uncle Vanya, which I had first seen four years ago, was described as a "meteorological" production, because one could tell from the lighting effects what the weather was, even the exact time of day. Through the windows could be seen the Russian countryside and there, in the distance, charcoal fires smoldering on a hill.
       
        The setting was spectacularly exact, a perfect replica of a provincial estate of some eighty years past; but Chekhov himself often complained that Stanislavsky wasted time on inessentials. What do charcoal fires have to do with Uncle Vanya? A more selective directorial approach was found with Peter Brook, whose celebrated international company from the Bouffes du Nord in Paris took on the challenging task of playing The Cherry Orchard in English before Moscow audiences.
       
        There were no elaborate sets in Brook's The Cherry Orchard, just
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy