World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Poland Speaks


Article # : 15259 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 8 / 1989  2,511 Words
Author : Joshua Muravchik
Joshua Muravchik is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.

       As returns began to roll in at Solidarity election offices around Poland on June 4, weeks of tension gave way to joy but then quickly turned to fear. The joy flowed from the sweeping victory that Solidarity-backed candidates had won in Poland's first genuine election under communist rule. The fear flowed from the astonishing margin of that victory, dealing the communist government a defeat so humiliating that some Solidarity activists could not believe the authorities would allow the count to be completed and announced. Perhaps instead the government would tear a page from Panamanian ruler Manuel Noriega's book and simply abort the election. These fears, fortunately, proved unfounded. Honorably, the authorities swallowed their bitter pill, feeling, in the words of Central Committee member Janusz Reykowski, "like soldiers of a defeated army."
       
        The margin of the outcome shocked the opposition as well as the government. During the brief campaign Solidarity activists had worried that the election was as much a trap as an opportunity. They faced huge logistical hurdles without the time to overcome them. This, as they say in the communist world, was no accident. During the hard bargaining of last spring's "roundtable" talks, government negotiators made many concessions, but one item on which they would not budge was the early date for elections--less than two months from signing the agreement. When asked why he was so adamant about holding the election quickly, the chief government negotiator (also the interior minister) said, "I want to win them."
       
        The authorities processed elaborate machinery for communicating, mounting a campaign, and organizing their supporters--offices, equipment, staff, publications, and party structure. The opposition lacked all of these things, except publications, scores of which have flourished in the Polish underground in recent years, but even these included none of mass circulation. The challenge it now faced was to organize a nationwide campaign in 150 districts and to train volunteers without the use of such elementary amenities as telephones and coping machines.
       
        During a visit to Poland just a month before the election, I found opposition activists almost uniformly pessimistic about its outcome. They did not fear that they would lose outright, but they doubted they would win the kind of decisive victory that would vindicate their position. The doubts rose both from their daunting material disadvantages and also, it seemed, from uncertainty about the true dimension of their popular support. Before the election, they could gauge their support only on the basis of the numbers of
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy