World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Gentrifyin' Blues


Article # : 14992 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 9 / 1988  3,949 Words
Author : James J. Thompson, Jr.
James J. Thompson, Jr., is the book review editor for The New Oxford Review. He has written three books: Tried as by Fire: Southern Baptists and the Religious Controversies of the 1920s (Mercer University Press, 1982); Christian Classics Revisited (Ignatius Press, 1983); and Fleeing the Whore of Babylon: A Modern Conversion Story (Christian Classics, Inc., 1986). He has coedited (with George M. Curtis III) The Southern Essays of Richard M. Weaver (Liberty Press, 1987).

       THE TWENTY-SEVENTH CITY
       Jonathan Franzen
       New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1988
       571 pp., $19.95
       
       It would probably take most people about five seconds to rattle off everything they know about St. Louis: Budweiser, the Arch, Ozzie Smith and the Cardinals. Two out of three rates excellent; list all three and you qualify as an expert in urban arcana. "But all cities are ideas," Jonathan Franzen avers. "They create themselves, and the rest of the world apprehends them or ignores them as it chooses,"
       
        If this is true (and like most pop-sociological obiter dicta, it sort of sounds reasonable), then St. Louis has a problem. It does not stick in the mind or evoke a rush of associations. An unkind observer--a resident of Kansas City, perhaps--might borrow Gertrude Stein's quip about Oakland: "There's no there there." A hundred years ago St. Louis ranked as one of the nation's premier cities--Queen of the Upper Mississippi, Gateway to the West, Capital of the Heartland. By 1980 it had receded into obscurity and fallen to twenty-seventh in population among American cities.
       
        For those unfamiliar with the city, this statistic may conjure up an image of Rust Belt decay and dereliction: cold smokestacks and sepulchral factories, weeds pushing through cracked sidewalks, rats scrabbling through the rubble of tumbledown shopping malls. Not so. In recent years, St Louis has undergone one of those ubiquitous "urban renaissances" that have become the urban planner's banality--banal, because of the dreary sameness of the phenomenon wherever it crops up. Slap together a few glass skyscrapers; throw in a couple of chichi hotels with a tiny Niagara and a luxuriant jungle in the lobby; convert some decrepit warehouses into fern bars, quiche dives, and fussy boutiques; sweep up the winos and hide the blacks: Voila!--a renaissance.
       
        Granted, St. Louis proper has lost population, but this has resulted largely from white flight to the suburbs than fan out across neighboring St. Louis County. Despite this, old St. Louis is enjoying a revival, and its suburbs, not to be outdone, exude something akin to Sun Belt ebullience. As a whole Greater St. Louis, even in the absence of a recognizable identity, is not a city on the skids.
       
        Franzen's surefire
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy