World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Overwhelming Question


Article # : 14988 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 9 / 1988  3,075 Words
Author : Gregory Wolfe
Gregory Wolfe is the founder and coeditor of Image: A Journal of the Arts and Religion, and a frequent contributor to The World & I.

       In a special issue of the New Criterion dedicated to surveying the arts in America since World War II, the journal's literary editor, Bruce Bawer, contributed an essay on the novel entitled "Diminishing Fictions." As the title indicates, Bawer believes that contemporary American novelists have retreated from the broad and open territory of the human heart into little hermetically sealed empires of art. The most vivid part of the vigorously argued essay is a critique of the new literary minimalism. The minimalists are known for their flat descriptions of the lives of punishingly ordinary, obscure people. Much of this description, according to Bawer, consists of catalogs of the brand names of products used in the home, along with the names of the television shows and ads that drone on in the background--punctuated by the insipid staccato dialogue of nearly moronic characters.
       
        Like most critics of the American literary establishment, however, Bawer is better at marshaling empirical evidence than at diagnosing the root causes of our cultural malaise. Neoconservative critics of the arts rightly point to a crucial loss of confidence among artists, affecting the scope and form of their art, but his crisis of confidence is understood primarily in political terms, as a rejection of bourgeois democracy by disaffected radicals. There are two crippling problems with this kind of argument. First, by confining themselves largely to the political plane, the neoconservatives leave themselves open to the charge that their positions are also politically motivated--that they are, in fact, the toadies of the capitalists. The pages of the New Criterion and Nation (to pick a couple of obvious antagonists) are filled with this circular type of name-calling.
       
        The second and more important weakness in the neoconservative critique is simply that it does not go far enough. The self-doubt of our novelists does not stem from a petulant refusal to support the bourgeois order (though it often includes this) but from a more radical doubt about the intelligibility of the world. In short, the crisis of confidence in the West has theological and philosophical roots. The belief that our knowledge of the world is either relative or mere delusion has had an inevitable impact on narrative fiction. From the huge, expansive novels of the nineteenth century, with their affirmations and "real-ism," we have moved to works that self-consciously call attention to their fictional machinery. If the novelist cannot provide a window onto reality, then he must ultimately write about himself, and his technique, politics, or personal problems come to the forefront of his work. Like the post-modernist Pompidou Center in Paris, with its exposed pipes, wires, and
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy