World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Czechoslovakia's Struggle for the Future


Article # : 14623 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1988  3,497 Words
Author : Jiří V. Kotas
Jiří V. Kotas is a former research fellow of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. He escaped to the West in 1979. He was elected chairman of the Czechoslovak Federal Council-in-exile in 1980 and is the publisher of the council's magazine Českoslovenksá cesta (Czechoslovak way).

       After the string of deaths in the Kremlin between 1982 and 1985 and Mikhail Gorbachev's ascent to party leadership in March 1985, a paradox of unforeseen proportions appeared. The Czechoslovak communists, always the most faithful followers of the Soviet line, started to hint that not everything Soviet should be blindly copied in Czechoslovakia and betrayed increasing nervousness about the unclear notions of even glasnost and perestroika. Another unprecedented occurrence is the big demand in Czechoslovakia for Soviet newspapers; specific issues of Pravda of Izvestia (previously totally neglected pieces of paper) that reported on the progress of current Soviet reform debates remained mysteriously unavailable. Also, television antennas allowing the reception of Soviet programs disappeared from the market. (Almost everybody in Czechoslovakia understands Russian, due to years of obligatory training.) The extremely orthodox and aging Czechoslovak leadership, insecure and knowing that its own political survival depended solely on Moscow's support, started a slow process of a barely perceptible realignment of party leaders into two camps.
       
        On one side are the veritable neo-Stalinists in the Central Committee Presidium (Gustáv Husák, Miloö Jakeö, Alois Indra, Vasil Bilak, Antonín Kapek). On the other are those party leaders (Lubomír ätrougal, Jozef Lenárt, Peter Colotka) with a more fluid set of ideas, who are more vocal in stressing the need for reform, and who once (in 1968) temporarily sided with reformers.
       
        Glasnost's first victim?
       
        It became increasingly evident during 1986 and 1987 that Husák--a living embodiment of Czechoslovakia's worst Brezhnevism--was increasingly unacceptable to the new Soviet leadership. Moscow, however, was cautious not to send any premature or wrong signals to Czechoslovakia; Gorbachev's official Czechoslovak visit in April 1987 was, on the surface, still a mechanical exchange of niceties between two communist bosses.
       
        Gorbachev was greeted in Prague and at all stops of his Czechoslovak journey by unprecedented crowds. For the general public, it was a relatively safe way of expressing total disagreement with nearly two decades of Husák's rule. Rumors about the possible recall of Soviet troops and other equally unfounded illusions circulated widely, and although Gorbachev certainly did not meet Dubček in secret, as was reported in some Western press releases, he clearly indicated that the Soviet leadership would not attempt to stop some
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy