World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Individualism vs. Liberal Arts Education


Article # : 14557 

Section : MODERN THOUGHT
Issue Date : 3 / 1988  4,328 Words
Author : Robert L. Spaeth
Robert L. Spaeth is professor of liberal studies and codirector of the Christian Humanism project at St. John's University, Collegeville, Minnesota. He is coauthor (with R.W. Franklin) of Virgil Michel: American Catholic (Liturgical Press, 1988) and the author of Exhortations on Liberal Education: A Dean Speaks His Mind (St. John's University, 1988); The Church and a Catholic's Conscience (Harper & Row, 1985) and No Easy Answers: Christians Debate Nuclear Arms (Harper and Row, 1983).

       Teaching in a liberal arts college I have always found to be by and large a pleasant way of life. And the opening days of a new academic year are always especially enjoyable. But it is distressing to learn, as we all have in recent years, that many sympathetic observers of undergraduate education have concluded that we in liberal arts colleges are doing a poor job.
       
        We cannot ignore our critics. They are too numerous, too highly placed, too thoughtful to dismiss without a fair hearing. Moreover, they deserve a thoughtful reply, particularly from those whose life is devoted to liberal education.
       
        Let me remind you of some of the disturbing things recently published about undergraduate liberal education in this country.
       
        · In 1984, when William Bennett was director of the National Endowment for the Humanities, he assembled a distinguished study group to consider the "state of learning in the humanities in higher education." Mr. Bennett subsequently wrote a report, "To Reclaim a Legacy," which bluntly asserted that "both teaching and learning in the humanities are not what they should or can be, and they are neither taught as well nor studied as carefully as they deserve to be." Bennett spoke harshly of college professors when he said that "we in the academy have failed to bring the humanities to life and to insist on their value." With regard to our students, Bennett found "not merely a rejection of a career in the humanities but a rejection of the humanities themselves." Appropriate and at times horrifying evidence was provided to back up these judgments.
       
        · In 1985, the Association of American Colleges published a report, again based on the work of a distinguished committee, called "Integrity in the College Curriculum." In the first chapter, ominously entitled "The Decline and Devaluation of the Undergraduate Degree," these judgments are made about American liberal education:
       
        Writing as an undergraduate experience... is widely neglected.
       
        Foreign language incompetence in now not only a national embarrassment but... threatens to be an enfeebling disadvantage....
       
        As for what passes as a college curriculum, almost anything goes.
       
        The curriculum... is
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy