World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Lyubimov's Lulu: Innocence Dressed in Blood


Article # : 14491 

Section : THE ARTS
Issue Date : 3 / 1988  1,720 Words
Author : Nicholas Rudall
Nicholas Rudall is artistic director of the Court Theatre, Chicago, and professor of classics at the University of Chicago.

       At the outset of these observations on the recent production of Lulu at the Lyric Opera of Chicago, I should make clear that my profession is the theater and I am a neophyte to the world of opera. As a matter of fact, I know very few theater professionals who feel comfortable in an opera house. There are notable and brilliant exceptions--including, of course, Sir Peter Hall (who directed Le Nozze di Figaro for an earlier Lyric Opera Production this season), and the current director of Lulu, Yuri Lyubimov. What makes us uncomfortable is the little matter of convention--that tacit acceptance by an audience of what is the illusion of truth. For us journeymen of the stage, realism is a convention that seeks to mirror the natural behavior of life. That is a narrow view, of course, but it accounts for our discomfort in the presence of theatrical conventions where majestic music and great voices have to be matched by great themes and majestic settings.
       
        But despite such professional prejudices, inadequacies, and trepidations, I went to this Lulu with a pleasurable anticipation. I knew a little of Alban Berg's Wozzeck since I had recently staged the play and had listened to the opera. But I knew nothing of this mountain of an opera except the original plays by Franz Wedekind (Erdgeist and Die Büchse der Pandora). Wedekind prefigured, if not fathered, German Expressionist drama. Expressionism was a reaction to Naturalism, giving its exponents the freedom to paint human issues on a large canvas. Its focus was on Sex and Money and Power and Death, and it could and did create characters who were types, even prototypes, rather than individuals.
       
        Berg seized upon Wedekind's brilliant "Lulu" plays seeing in their bizarre sexual Grand Guignol world the schema of a majestic modern opera. Lulu is the Earth Spirit, the Nymph/Wife/Whore whose cold sexuality is death to all who couple with her. Yet she is not a Calypso or a Circe; she is, somehow, the innocent instrument of necessary deaths. Implicit in the plays is the idea of the nexus of Sex and Death.
       
        'Monster Tragedy'
       
        Berg called his work "A Monster Tragedy in Five Acts." In many extraordinary ways Berg surmounted the implicit difficulties of the Wedekind plays. If the subject is treated with the slightest faltering touch, it becomes merely sordid and, perhaps worse, foolish. A sexual being who runs through husbands who die by heart attack, suicide, and murder is potentially as ludicrous as she is lethal. But the opera, through its haunting, violent, and unsettling twelve-tone music,
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy