World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Go Slow in Trade With Moscow


Article # : 14409 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 6 / 1988  2,488 Words
Author : Henry R. Nau
Henry R. Nau is professor and associate dean at the School of International Affairs of George Washington University. He served from 1981-83 as a senior staff member of the National Security Council responsible for international economic issues.

       In the American lexicon, trade has often been equated with rapprochement and peace, never more so than in the case of East-West trade. Today, once again, expectations are rising that the United States, through its trade policies, can play a significant role in economic and political liberalization in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union.
       
        The Soviet Union is doing nothing to discourage these expectations. Mikhail Gorbachev, general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, met with American industrialists during the Washington summit in December 1987 and again in April 1988 to promote the idea of joint ventures and other business arrangements between U.S. and Soviet firms. He called for "a new system of coordinates in the economic relationship between our society and ideologically different countries."
       
        Making such arrangements more attractive this time around are reforms in the Soviet Union meant to decentralize management and control of foreign trade, decontrol prices, and improve worker incentives. In addition, the Soviet Union has expressed an interest in joining the principal international economic institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
       
        By any realistic measure, the obstacles to East-West trade are formidable. The reforms in the Soviet Union are in their early stages and remain uncertain. Bureaucratic resistance is evident; labor unrest is possible, especially in Eastern Europe. The Soviet capacity to export and pay for significant new industrial imports from the West is constrained by a weak dollar and low oil and gold prices. Soviet borrowing has already increased substantially, raising the Soviet foreign debt from a little over $20 billion in 1985 to almost $40 billion at the end of 1986. Soviet exports to the United States continue to be restricted by the Jackson-Vanik amendment, which denies most-favored-nation treatment to Soviet products, and the Stevenson-Church amendment limiting U.S. government financing to the Soviet Union through the Export-Import Bank.
       
        Nevertheless, hope springs eternal, and there are prospects for an announcement of major new U.S.-Soviet business ventures when President Reagan and Gorbachev meet for the fourth time at the Moscow summit. Moreover, economic change and renewal are long overdue in Eastern Europe. These countries--Poland, Hungary, Yugoslavia--could clearly use Western help. Western Europe, especially West Germany, is gearing up to provide such help. The United States could be left out, and new and bitter issues of East-West trade
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy