World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Kanun ve Aile: Law and Family in Turkey


Article # : 14396 

Section : CULTURE
Issue Date : 6 / 1988  6,062 Words
Author : Paul J. Magnarella
Paul J. Magnarella is professor of anthropology and Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Florida.

       The Turkish Republic was established in 1923 on the crumbled foundations of the Ottoman Empire. During the Ottoman era, which lasted from the fifteenth century to World War I, Islam provided Ottoman Muslims a framework of meaning within which to interpret their past and present circumstances and the future directions of their lives. Embodying the ethical basis for thought and behavior in the private realm, Islam constituted the divinely sanctioned jurisprudential basis for law and government. The Ottoman sultan was also the caliph, simultaneously head of state and leader of the Sunni Muslims.
       
        As part of a master plan to create a modern, progressive Turkish state, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey's founder and first president, made secularization one of his uncompromising principles. Considering Islam a source of the Ottoman decline, Ataturk launched a bold attempt to create a new national mentality by abolishing the Shari'a (Islamic law) and adopting European legal codes, which he regarded as the epitome of Western civilization.
       
        Legal scholars generally maintain that law responds to existing morals, customs, and traditions; societal change precedes legal change. Ataturk was determined to reverse the equation. He wanted imported Western law to displace Turco-Islamic tradition and thus create a new moral basis for a Western, secular style of life. Did he succeed? In 1955 a group of Turkish and Western scholars addressed this question with respect to Turkey's adoption of Swiss family law and answered with a qualified no. This article reviews their assessment and reexamines the question in the light of more recent evidence.
       
        The traditional Shari'a
       
        Unlike Roman law, which was devised by men and so could be changed openly as circumstances required, the Shari'a is considered God-given and immutable by humans. In theory, the Shari'a was derived from four sources: the Quran, the Sunna (traditions of the Prophet), the consensus of qualified jurists, and analogical deductions from these. In historic fact, the pre-Islamic customary law and administrative practices of the early Islamic states strongly influenced the character of the Shari'a.
       
        Of the four Sunni schools of law, the Hanafi school became the official doctrine of the Ottomans. The Shari'a reigned supreme with no rival codes until the nineteenth century, when the needs for administrative efficiency and economic development along with pressures to appease foreign powers caused the
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy