World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Bad Times for Good Hearts


Article # : 14209 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 7 / 1988  4,346 Words
Author : James J. Thompson. Jr.
James J. Thompson. Jr., is the book review editor of the New Oxford Review. He has written three books: Tried As by Fire: Southern Baptists and the Religious Controversies of the 1920s (1982); Christian Classics Revisited (1983); and Fleeing the Whore of Babylon: A Modern Conversion Story (1986). He has coedited The Southern Essays of Richard M. Weaver (1987).

       GOOD HEARTS
       Reynolds Price
       New York: Atheneum, 1988
       275 pages, $18.95
       
        Duckness used to be fairly easy to spot. If it had feathers like a duck, waddled like a duck, and quacked like a duck, then the irrefragable rules of logic dictated that it was a duck. Southern novelists seem determined to deny their duckness. Lure twenty of them to a literary conference (large quantities of cheap bourbon will usually do the trick), and at least nineteen of them will obdurately refuse to be introduced as a Southern novelist. Why disclaim your duckness when it is an old and honorable condition? If a man or woman, born and raised in the South, sits down at a typewriter, fills page upon page with words about characters who dwell in the South, the result is a Southern novel, right? Wrong! shriek the authors: A duck is not always a duck.
       
        What is going on? To begin with, the king of that particular jungle known as Southern fiction is indisputably William Faulkner. His roar tends, by comparison, to reduce everyone else to a squeaky meow. This was not always true, for at the height of the "Southern Renaissance," that tidal wave of novelmaking that swept the South from, say, 1925 to 1955, Faulkner faced a raft of competitors for the throne. Literary critics (and what Gore Vidal derides as "book-chat people") discerned enough common themes and shared regional markings to warrant calling these writers "Southern." Those so designated did not protest. Who wouldn't be proud to be numbered in the surge of creativity that boosted the South to preeminence in the world of letters?
       
        By establishing himself as the epitome of the Southern novelist, Faulkner erected for succeeding writers not only a model to emulate, but a goal seemingly impossible to attain. By the 1950s a curious phenomenon emerged: Young Southerners published Faulknerian novels while simultaneously denying that they were Southern Writers. As the critic Louis Rubin put it, "getting out from under Faulkner" became the enduring problem for Southerners. By repudiating the regional tag--by disowning their duckness--they hoped to obviate the inevitable comparison with the master.
       
        Other Ducks and the Problem of Duckness
       
        If some ducks wish to deny their duckness, others have been transformed into swans. To wit: Young novelists in the South today can
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy