World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Revitalizing the War on Drugs


Article # : 13959 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1988  3,197 Words
Author : James A. Inciardi
James A. Inciardi is professor and director of the Division of Criminal Justice at the University of Delaware.

       During the second half of 1986, it appeared that the American government might finally take its rhetorical "war on drugs" seriously. Although the number of people smoking, snorting, swallowing, or otherwise injecting themselves with one drug or another had not changed dramatically, a new variable had been introduced into the drug-use equation. 1986 was the year that the national media discovered crack cocaine. For Newsweek, crack became the biggest story since Vietnam and the fall of the Nixon presidency; other media giants compared the spread of crack with the plagues of medieval Europe. By the end of 1986, the major dailies and weekly news magazines had presented the nation with more than one thousand stories in which crack figured prominently. Not to be outdone, network television offered hundreds of reports on drug abuse, capped by CBS's 48 Hours on Crack Street, a prime-time presentation that became one of the highest-rated documentaries in the history of television.
       
        The media had accomplished two things: First, they inflamed public concern, then claimed to be reflecting it. Indeed, as purveyors of horror stories about new flavor-of-the-month drugs, such as crack, the media had become "pushers" in their own right. Second, they instigated politicians to react to the drug problem as "politicians." Knowing that the White House was planning a late summer initiative against drugs, for example, Democrats in the House and Senate hastily drafted their own approach to the matter--an antidrug bill that at first appeared modest, but gathered some rather expensive moss as it was rolled from one committee to the next. In addition, politicians on the election beat across the nation began vaulting over one another, hoping to reach the frontlines of the antidrug parade, attempting to demonstrate how thoroughly and unconditionally they disapproved of cocaine, marijuana, heroin, and other illegal substances. It was politics at its best and politics at its worst; but curiously, some of it turned out to be a good thing. A new spirit of antidrug awareness began to gather momentum, backed by Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No" campaign as well as a $1.7 billion commitment to fund drug law enforcement, treatment, education, and indeed, a renewed war on drugs.
       
        Now that more than a year has come and gone, do many people remember the drug crisis of 1986? Could it really be that the media and the American people were so obsessed with crack-cocaine? Was it only in September of 1986 that opinion polls were showing drug abuse topping economic problems and the threat of war as America's number one national concern? The answer to both of these latter questions is "yes," but revelation of the Iran-Contra connection followed by rising
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy