World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Chile: A Crucial Year


Article # : 13590 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 4 / 1988  1,303 Words
Author : Oscar Godoy-Arcaya
Oscar Godoy-Arcaya is director of the Institute of Political Science of Catholic University of Chile and a member of Chile's Academy of Social Sciences.

       The year 1988 is crucial for Chile's return to democracy. The constitution calls for a plebiscite to be held before the end of the year, beginning the process of electing a president.
       
        For the realization of this event, two electoral bodies will function: one restrictive, composed of the four supreme commanders of the armed forces (army, navy, air force, and police), whose function is to designate the candidate who will be the object of the plebiscite; and the other broad, including all registered Chilean voters, whose number it is hoped will reach about 6.5 million. The citizens must accept (si) or reject (no) the person nominated.
       
        The government will presumably hold the plebiscite at a time most favorable to itself. It is likely that it will set the date in August and call the plebiscite for September.
       
        During the past year, the opposition proposed that open and competitive elections be substituted for the plebiscite. But Gen. Augusto Pinochet's government rejected this demand, arguing that elections involve the classical, democratic method of electing persons to representative public office, while a plebiscite does not allow a choice among many persons. Despite much discussion revolving around these issues, the regime would not relent. In short, Pinochet considers it unwise to open a competitive race for power, at least during this step along the way from his authoritarian government to a democracy.
       
        Several opposition members finally accepted the rules of the game imposed by the military regime and not only agreed to tolerate the legal statute that controls political parties, but also carried out a voter registration campaign. They have initiated a wide-ranging strategy to promote a "no" vote.
       
        Part of the opposition (the political parties of the Center and Center-Left) has united to present the country with a program for a moderate government. It calls for a four-year government during which certain reforms would be made in the constitution to make it less authoritarian. Among the most significant reforms proposed are an increase in the power of the legislative branch over the executive and the subordination of the armed forces to civilian authority. This program recognizes certain accomplishments of the government and advocates the preservation of the basic institutions of the free-market economy, but with a social democratic bias.
       
       
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy