World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Let's Endorse a South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone


Article # : 13445 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 9 / 1987  2,190 Words
Author : Ben Blaz
Ben Blaz is the representative from Guam in Congress and a retired brigadier general in the U.S. Marine Corps.

       The United States has, over the past decade, joined with nations around the world in establishing four major nuclear-free zones that play an important role in preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons by carving out huge slices of the earth where, by international agreement, the nuclear arms race is prohibited.
       
        There has been bipartisan approval by several U.S. administrations of the concept and practice of nuclear-free zones in other regions of nonproliferation concern, specifically, in the South Asia subcontinent, Africa, and the Middle East.
       
        Our nation is now a member of the Treaty of Tlatelolco, the Antarctic Treaty, the Seabed Arms Control Treaty, and the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space. These declare nuclear-weapons-free zones, respectively, for all of South America, Antarctica, the deep seabeds of the world, and all of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies.
       
        These are vital pacts that complement bilateral and multilateral arms reduction treaties among the nuclear powers. The zones act, in a sense, to set borders on the arms race, to limit it, and to provide assurances to nervous nations that their neighbors are not attempting "to steal a nuclear arms march" on them.
       
        We should not ignore the exclusion-zone front because of preoccupation with bilateral negotiations. Neither should we encourage or join zones that jeopardize our strategic interests by hampering our existing nuclear forces. That, to my mind, would be a form of unilateral disarmament that would undermine the strong deterrence we need to bring the Soviets to the nuclear arms reduction-negotiating table.
       
        The United States has a new opportunity to create movement on this lesser-known front, but we remain mired in the trenches because of a lack of clarity among policymakers on whether a South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone hampers or helps our strategic interests.
       
        The Treaty of Rarotonga, which came into effect in December 1986, has been endorsed by more than a dozen nations of the South Pacific, including such firm U.S. allies as Australia and Fiji.
       
        The treaty prohibits the testing, manufacture, acquisition, and stationing of nuclear weapons in the territory of the signatories to the
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy