World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Did the Intellectuals Lose Nicaragua?


Article # : 13421 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 9 / 1987  6,262 Words
Author : Daniel James
Daniel James has written extensively on Cuba. He is the author of Cuba: First Soviet Satellite in the Americas and Che Guevara: a Bibliography, and editor-translator of The Complete Bolivian Diaries of Che Guevara and Other Captured Documents.

       THE JAGUAR SMILE: A NICARAGUAN JOURNEY
       Salman Rushdie
       New York: Viking, 1987
       171 pp., $12.95
       
       NICARGUA: REVOLUTION IN THE FAMILY
       Shirley Christian
       New York: Random House, 1986
       450 pp., $10.00
       
       TURNING IN THE TIDE
       Noam Chomsky
       Boston: South End Press
       300 pp., $10.00
       
        A debate over who lost Nicaragua is sure to follow the Reagan administration's departure from office, if it does not erupt during the presidential campaign. It will probably focus on the administration itself, in the first place, and the Congress, in the second. The reason for that order is obvious: The reason for that order is obvious: The executive proved unable to frame a Central America policy that was viable and win a consensus for it among the public (and, for that reason, in the Congress as well). The Congress then seized the opportunity to make policy, as it has frequently tried to do since Vietnam. However, after faulting Reagan for a bad policy, it presented no alternative - and likewise failed to lead. The end result has been the tragicomic Iran-Contra hearings on Capitol Hill. A third culprit, however, and one that history may decide is as much, or even more to blame, is the American intelligentsia.
       
        The large and still growing literature on Nicaragua, which this writer has combed over an extended period of time, is conspicuous for its lack of solid analysis or creative ideas. This is true of academic authors. And it is true of intellectuals identified with the Right and the Center - sad, in view of the fact that Reagan was "their" president and his administration provided the best possible environment for developing a coherent policy for both Nicaragua, a challenge in itself, and for Central America-Mexico, the even greater challenge.
       
        The National Bipartisan Commission on Central America came closest to creating a viable policy. Central American nations are notoriously poor and are precariously dependent on one or two products. A Central American policy must taken seriously the region's need for economic aid planned over enough years to allow for
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy