World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

A 'Visionary' Proposal for Farmers


Article # : 13250 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 10 / 1987  1,877 Words
Author : Rudy Boschwitz
Rudy Boschwitz is a Republican senator from Minnesota. He serves on the Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs.

       On July 6, 1987, President Reagan laid down in Geneva the most ambitious agricultural subsidy reform plan ever proposed. Agriculture, now protected by a dazzling array of barriers, tariffs, and subsidies, would have those trade impediments totally phased out over a 10-year period or by the year 2000.
       
        Unlike manufactured goods, for which trade restraints have been dramatically reduced in the postwar years, agriculture has become more protected. It is a time for boldness. Reagan's proposal is the "zero option" of nuclear arms negotiation applied to agriculture.
       
        The plan has been called everything from "pie in the sky" to "visionary." Assessing the viability of the proposal depends as much on whether one is an optimist or a pessimist as it does on the specifics of the plan. Being an optimist, I believe that the plan is ambitious but achievable. Even if only half is accomplished, it will nonetheless be of historic proportions.
       
        American farmers, Western Europe, and the developing world all have much to gain from a world in which food is produced, sold, and consumed more freely than it is today.
       
        For most major crops, the American farmer is as efficient as any in the world, despite low land and labor costs found elsewhere. U.S. farmers - contrary to the popular notion - have not been subsidized to the degree that European farmers have and therefore are more in touch with production technologies and marketing strategies needed in a market-oriented environment. Moreover, the agricultural infrastructure in the United States, which employs more people than there are farmers and which would be immeasurably helped by this proposal, is second to none. Indeed, this infrastructure provides the decided edge for U.S. competitiveness. This country has good roads, rails, an extensive river system with locks and dams, deep-water ocean ports, unit train-car loading and unloading facilities, and grain storage facilities that extend all the way from farms to ports. No other system compares with this, and it makes movement of farm commodities to ports competitive with any in the world.
       
        Undergirding American farmers and agribusinesses is a stable political and financial system and an economy that generally reflects the working of free enterprise. No other single agricultural producer and exporter can boast the efficiency of our farmers, the vastness of our agribusiness infrastructure, and the soundness of our political and economic
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy