World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Minimum Wage: Time for a Change? Yes


Article # : 12943 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 5 / 1987  2,117 Words
Author : Rogan Kersh
Rogan Kersh has written on economic issues for Business Today and is the author of a forthcoming study on American foundation philanthropy, to be published by the Council on Foundations. He has also worked in Washington for Newsday.

       Seven times in the past half-century Congress has acted to raise the minimum wage. The last hike, which took effect on January 1, 1981, set the floor at $3.35 an hour, as required by legislation passed in 1977. The 100th Congress has renewed deliberation on the issue, and individuals and groups of widely ranging opinions are already converging on what is expected to be a protracted debate.
       
        The minimum wage has long been a controversial topic, in part because it appears readily comprehensible (especially when compared to most economic issues) and also because it directly affects the pocketbooks of millions of workers, businesses, and consumers.
       
        The basic concept underlying a national minimum wage is deceptively simple. Workers must be paid at or above a specified rate, thus assuring those at the low end of the pay scale at least subsistence-level salaries and forcing would-be exploitative employers to pay better than they otherwise might. The minimum figure is not intended to represent an average wage, even for unskilled labor, but rather a "safety net" for the poorest workers. The average manufacturing wage, indeed, normally is around twice the minimum, and often the impetus for new hikes in the minimum wage comes from a significant widening of the gap between the two.
       
        Reducing poverty has proved an elusive aim almost everywhere it is pursued, and the actual effects of the wage remain far more complex than the underlying logic suggests. Minimum wage disputes are contentious enough that the issue is refought every five years or so, and in 1987 it has surfaced once again.
       
        AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland, in a news conference at the labor organization's winter conference, mentioned $4.61 as an "exact number" compensating for price rises since the 1981 hike in the minimum. Kirkland's comments were echoed by House and Senate majority leaders James Wright and Robert Byrd. House and Senate Democratic leaders on March 25 launched a drive to rise the minimum wage in stages to $4.65 by 1990. Given an administration consistently opposed to higher minimum wage levels, the battle lines seem clearly drawn.
       
        In considering the various claims put forth by proponents and opponents of a higher minimum wage, it is useful to briefly review the history of the issue, particularly since the same arguments turn up repeatedly in only slightly altered form. In the United States, minimum wage legislation was first enacted in 1938, when Franklin D. Roosevelt
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy