|
|
|
| Current Issue |
|
|
| Resources |
|
|
|
Behind Closed Doors: Who Is Regulating Sex, and How
| Article
# : |
12919 |
|
|
Section : |
BOOK WORLD
|
| Issue
Date : |
5 / 1987 |
2,886 Words |
| Author
: |
Connaught Marshner
Connaught Marshner is a writer and editor of Conservative
Digest, in Washington, D.C. |
THE REGULATION OF SEXUALITY
Carol Joffe
Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986
166 pp., $24.95
In modern America there is a new and proliferating breed of person whose job it is to manage our sexuality: counselors at family-planning clinics. Sex has become so technologized that it is deemed the sphere of separate experts. Women of all ages and walks of life who have a desire to control the fruits of their sexuality while still enjoying its pleasures turn their footsteps to the same door.
What happens behind that door is the subject of Carol Joffe's book.
Why It Matters
How the door came to be there at all is the story of competing policy currents. The story is worth repeating because, for sixteen years now, the nation has had a governmental commitment at the highest levels - federal, state, and local revenues for family planning reached $442 million in 1981.
The commitment is not without consequences. For example, presently more than a million teenagers become pregnant each year, and the trend shows no signs of reversing. Statistically, the increase in teen pregnancy parallels the increase in teen-accessible clinics. In the Wall Street Journal last fall, Stan Weed of the Institute for Research and Evaluation reported a "fivefold increase in teen-age clients and a twenty-fold constant-dollar increase in funding - 50 to 120 more pregnancies per thousand clients, rather than the 200 to 300 fewer pregnancies anticipated by the Alan Guttmacher Institute."
The pro-clinic establishment tends to point out that the teen birthrate is lower. What that statistic conceals is the fact that the teen abortion rate is higher. In an era of diminishing governmental spending, we might ask how our nation got itself into a position of paying millions of dollars to supervise an increase in unmarried sexual activity that leads to a higher abortion rate. The question needs to be asked: Do we want to subsidize the increase by continuing to pay to undo its effects?
Joffe's Research
Carole Joffe does not ask that question, but
...
Read Full Article
Look for this article in Ask.com
|
|
