World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Democratic Challenge in Taiwan


Article # : 12768 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 3 / 1987  2,286 Words
Author : Hungdah Chiu
Hungdah Chiu is a professor of law at the University of Maryland Law School and has written, edited, and coauthored many books in English and Chinese. He is president of the American Association for Chinese Studies.

       For the first time in Chinese history, on December 6, 1986, worldwide attention was focused on a general election in the Republic of China - even though no one expected the ruling Nationalist Party (Kuomintang or KMT) to lose. This was because the December election was the first time a meaningful opposition party - the newly formed Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) - was tolerated (although technically the DPP remained illegal).
       
        Nominally, Taiwan has two other legal opposition parties: the China Youth Party (CYP) and China Democratic Socialist Party (CDSP). However, since 1980 the popular vote each of these has received is less than 1 percent, and they have thus become politically insignificant. In previous elections, the Nationalist government has allowed candidates to run as independents, except for the candidates of the two legal opposition parties. Thus, the December 6 election was viewed as a major step toward democratization of the political process in Taiwan.
       
        Despite its authoritarian nature, the rule of the KMT has provided political stability in Taiwan, and has therefore been essential in contributing to the rapid economic development and social progress of Taiwan since 1950. Per capita income jumped from less than $100 in 1950 to more than $3,500 in 1985. Moreover, during this period, the ratio of per capita income between the top 20 percent and bottom 20 percent of the population has been reduced from 15 to 1 in the early 1950s to about 4 to 1 in 1985. Thus, it terms of income distribution, Taiwan's society is one of the most egalitarian in the world. (The ratio of per capita income between the top and the bottom 20 percent of the population in the United States is about 9 to 1, and in Mexico it is 20 to 1.) The adult literacy rate has reached 93 percent, and about 20 percent of the college-aged youth are in junior colleges, colleges, or graduate schools. More than a million people from Taiwan travel abroad for business of pleasure each year. A recent survey indicated that about 70 percent of the people considered themselves middle or upper-middle class.
       
        Growing demands for democracy
       
        With a population that is better educated and more affluent, it is only natural to witness growing demands for more democracy in Taiwan, and especially for more effective participation in the political process of the island. While the KMT leaders have been fully aware of this trend, the party has not moved quickly enough to respond to rising demands and expectations, especially in regard to the lifting of martial law and removal of
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy