World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Uganda's Struggle to Break With the Past


Article # : 12515 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1987  2,814 Words
Author : Oliver W. Furley
Oliver Furley, an East African specialist and former senior lecturer at Makerere University, is currently professor of politics and history at Coventry Polytechnic in Great Britain.

       Until the British established a protectorate, Uganda was not one country but many: The area consisted of four kingdoms and a number of ethnic groups organized along differing segmentary lines. The centralized kingdoms were in the South, and the people in the south generally belonged to the Bantu-speaking groups, who had little linguistic, ethnic, or cultural affinity with the taller, darker Nilotic groups in the North. Much has been written about this North-South divide in Uganda. It is sometimes exaggerated, but it is always there, and it still poses perhaps the greatest problem for Yoweri Museveni's government today.
       
        The British compounded the difficulties by favoring the kingdoms, and according them special self-governing privileges, in the system of "indirect rule." The central kingdom of Buganda, especially, had a formal agreement with the British granting them semiautonomy and a special status within the protectorate. They remained a state within a state, headed by their Kabaka (king), and at the time of independence would have preferred to break off and form their own nation-state, sloughing off the poorer, less developed areas of Uganda.
       
        This strong political separatism of the Buganda people has always presented a major obstacle to the postindependence governments of Uganda in building up a spirit of national unity. Museveni can approach it in a different way, because for the first time the government is predominantly "southern" in its personnel and its support, but whether Buganda aspiration can be contained within it remains to be seen. Already there have been pleas to restore the Kabakaship and put Prince Ronald Mutebi on the throne. Museveni has allowed him back in the country but has firmly forbidden talk of a restoration of the monarchy.
       
        Royalist sentiments, however, are not to be discounted and can be latched on to other political grievances at any time.
       
        Another troublesome historical legacy is the pattern of military recruitment. The British had the notion that only certain ethnic groups made the best soldiers and recruited for the King's African Rifles almost exclusively from the northerners - Acholi, Langi, and West Nilers, the "martial races" of Uganda. Milton Obote, the first ruler of independent Uganda, was himself a Langi and continued that process. So of course did Idi Amin. Museveni's guerrilla force, which has now taken over, was the first predominantly southern military force in this century. It triumphed, but the result has been a large remnant of disaffected northern soldiers in northern
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy