World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Pluses and Minuses of Foreign Investment in the United States


Article # : 12514 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 7 / 1987  3,565 Words
Author : Wiliam C. Freund
William C. Freund, chief economist emeritus of the New York Stock Exchange, occupies the New York Stock Exchange Chair in Economics and International Business at the Graduate School of Business of Pace University in New York City.

       When the giant Japanese semiconductor firm Fujitsu announced plans to pay $220 million to acquire 80 percent of Fairchild Semiconductor, Commerce Secretary Malcolm Baldrige and Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger appealed to the president to stop the deal. They argued that we should not allow the Japanese to take over an essential American defense facility and make ourselves dependent on the goodwill of a foreign nation. Lost in the rhetoric was the fact that Fairchild was already owned by Schlumberger Limited, a French company. Apparently, Americans are more sensitive to Japanese than European ownership. The Fairchild merger was called off.
       
        The shoe was on the other foot when the U.S. oil giant Amoco recently bid for ownership of Dome Petroleum, a Canadian oil company. Canadians are no less emotional when it comes to foreigners buying their companies. There was much debate about whether Canadian oil companies as big as Dome should be allowed on the international auction block. The issue became highly political when the liberal party campaigned for a Canadian rather than foreign takeover of Dome. American capital was put on notice that it was not welcome.
       
        International buyouts are becoming commonplace. In the decades from the 1950s through the 1970s, acquisitions were mostly by U.S. companies expanding abroad and becoming multinational. Again, the shoe is on the other foot, with foreigners keeping the investment pot boiling here.
       
        Recent examples of foreign acquisitions in the United States include the $2.8 billion cash purchase of Celanese by the German chemical giant Hoechst, the $1.3 billion takeover of Big Three Industries by France's L'Aire Liquide, and the $240 million buyout of Dunlop Tire Corporation by Japan's Sumitomo Rubber Industries.
       
        Foreign firms are on a U.S. buying spree for a variety of reasons. With the dollar down sharply in foreign markets, foreigners can buy U.S. companies at discount prices. Foreign firms like the stability and growth prospects of business in America. They look at the huge size of out market and want to participate in it. And often they seek to gain a foothold in the domestic market to avoid being shut out by a rising pitch of protectionist laws.
       
        There is another reason for proliferating international ownership. It may sound trite, but the world is shrinking. From auto companies to Wall Street bankers, products and services are increasingly marketed worldwide. And with international
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy