World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Wild Card of the Middle East


Article # : 12210 

Section : CURRENT ISSUES
Issue Date : 2 / 1987  2,025 Words
Author : Robert G. Neumann
Robert G. Neumann is senior adviser of Middle East Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.

       Syria has been a constant puzzle to America and the West, an unending picture of contradictions. It is the original home of Arab nationalism and yet has been instrumental in preventing greater Arab unity. Its leaders, especially President Hafez al-Assad, have displayed impressive feats of statesmanship and have been skillful negotiators yet have carefully targeted acts of terrorism against a variety of opponents.
       
        Syria is an ally of fundamentalist Iran but is a secular regime of the type detested by Khomeini, and Syria is fearful of fundamentalism rising within Syria itself or in Syrian-occupied Lebanon. It supports the cause of the Palestinians and yet is the most implacable enemy of PLO chairman Yasser Arafat. Its attitude toward the United States has been ambivalent, constantly thwarting or repelling U.S. initiatives, but obviously flattered by U.S. leaders who pay it special attention.
       
        Syria has been the most consistent enemy of Israel, yet the Israeli-Syrian border has been the most stable and the most peaceful. Syria is the Soviet Union's principal, in effect almost only, window to the Middle East and has greatly profited from Soviet military support. Yet the relationship between the two is full of frustration and antagonism.
       
        The official social and economic policy of Syria under its Ba'ath (Arab Socialist Renaissance Party) is nominally socialist, yet there is no country in the Middle East more bourgeois than Syria.
       
        With all those contradictions, one might well ask whether one can speak at all of a Syrian "policy" or is Syrian policy rather a maneuver for short-range gains?
       
        History of conflict
       
        Ancient Syria saw its land ruled by Amorites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Hebrews. It endured many waves of foreign invasions - Armenian, Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian - and for a long time lived under Turkish rule. Shortly after 600 B.C. Syria became the center of the Arab conquest of the Middle East, and the flower of the Arabic language in the Damascus-centered caliphate of the Omayyad Dynasty. Then for 400 years, from 1516 to 1918, it was part of the loosely governed Ottoman Empire.
       
        Between the two world wars, France controlled Syria through the instrument of a mandate under the League of Nations. Only on April 17, 1946, did
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy