World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The South as America


Article # : 12193 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 2 / 1987  5,827 Words
Author : Donald W. Livingston
Donald W. Livingston is associate professor of philosophy at Emory University. He is the author of Hume's Philosophy of Common Life and is working on a book-length study of the nature of Hume's conservative political philosophy.

       ALTERNATIVE AMERICAS
       A Reading of Antebellum Political Culture
       Anne Norton
       Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986
       363 pp.
       
        Anne Norton has written an original and profound study of the meaning and development of American national identity. Her subject is American political culture from 1815-1865, the period after the War of 1812 when the fledgling republic, having ended its last battle with England, began fighting with itself. What was the fight about, and is it over? Norton poses the former question but not the latter, yet she has written a book that prompts us to ask it. The question about what it means to be an American is still with us, and a necessary step to any humane and meaningful answer is to have worked through the minds of those Americans who loosed, and those who were cut down by, the fateful lightning of the "terrible swift sword."
       
        Liberal, Progressive Barriers to Historical Understanding
       
        We must try to put ourselves back in time to see how different concepts of American political culture were instantiated in the sectional conflict between the North and South. But it is difficult to carry out this act of historical reenactment for two reasons. First, owing to the prevailing liberal ideology, which has captured the main posts in the state and in literature, we are inclined to what Herbert Butterfield called the Whig interpretation of history, by which a present state of affairs is read into the past. This produces the illusion that in some way past agents were not only faint images of ourselves but also that the outcome of historical events was inevitable. We find it difficult to imagine that there was a time when there was no national union as we know it, that the expression "United States" was regularly followed by a plural verb, that the idea of an indivisible union was seen by many, North and South, as an innovation in violation of the established understanding of American political culture.
       
        Given the slavery issue, we are inclined to think that the conflict and the defeat of the South were inevitable. We think this whenever we sing "The Battle Hymn of the Republic." It is difficult for us to entertain the idea that slavery could have been abolished peacefully if the South had been left alone. Slavery existed throughout Central and South America, and the regimes in these areas were not part of the
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy