World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

The Importance of the Anthropic Principle


Article # : 11874 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 8 / 1987  3,263 Words
Author : Sir Don N. Page
Sir Don N. Page, professor of physics at the Pennsylvania State University, works in the area of quantum cosmology to try to understand some of the curious properties of our world, such as the difference between past and future.

       One of the main goals of science is to discover and explain facts about our world. While a great variety of scientific explanations exist, most serve as descriptive models, constructed to encompass many phenomena. The simpler and yet more inclusive a model is, the better it is considered scientifically.
       
        In the field of physics, the deepest and most unified explanations are generally mathematical models, for mathematics has proven to be an amazingly effective language for describing the world. Newton's laws of motion and their generalizations in special relativity (for velocities comparable to that of light) and in quantum mechanics (for sizes comparable to or smaller than atoms) describe in precise mathematical terms how objects move under the influence of known forces. The forces themselves are also described mathematically (e.g., Newton's laws of gravitation and Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism). One goal of physics is to unite the descriptions of the forces into a single "theory of everything" (TOE). Many physicists hope that this may be accomplished by a theory of what are called "superstrings."
       
        Even a TOE, however, would not be a complete model or description of the universe. Roughly speaking, a TOE would enable a sufficiently intelligent being to calculate everything that happens within the universe at all times if he, she or it somehow knows what everything in the universe is like at one particular time, say at its beginning. (This is analogous to what you do on a much smaller scale when you foresee roughly how a ball will travel if you throw it with a certain speed and direction). But a TOE itself does not pin down what the universe is like at any one time, such as its beginning. A TOE would give a complete set of equations for how the universe can evolve, but these equations would have many solutions, one for each possible initial state of the universe at the beginning. As Thomas Gold of Cornell University has put it, "Things are as they are because they were as they were," but even a TOE would not answer the question of why things were as they were. A complete model of the universe must include a description of the initial conditions, as well as the TOE equations for its evolution.
       
        As a guideline for selecting the initial conditions of our universe, as well as for choosing which TOE may be correct, the anthropic principle is gaining importance in physics and cosmology, although its true significance and applicability are controversial. Indeed, there are several versions of the anthropic principle defined in the introduction of Barrow and Tipler's book, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle appearing in
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy