World & I Online Magazine  
World & I School | World & I Homeschool | World & I College | World & I Library
 Username:   Password:     Subscribe   Register               About Us | Contact Us | FAQs
18-Year Archive Peoples of the World Book Review Worldwide Folktales Fathers of Faith
Search  
Sort by: Results Listed:
Date Range:    Advanced Search

Online Magazine
 
  Current Issue
Editorial
Current Issue
The Arts
Life
Natural Science
Culture
Book World
Modern Thought
  Resources
18-Year Archive
American Waves
Book Reviews
Ceremonies/Festivities
Eye on the High Court
Fathers of Faith
Footsteps of Lincoln
Millennial Moments
Peoples of the World
Profiles in Character
Teacher's Guide
Traveling the Globe
Worldwide Folktales
Writers and Writing

Criminal Justice on Trial


Article # : 11728 

Section : BOOK WORLD
Issue Date : 4 / 1987  2,845 Words
Author : Graham Hughes
Graham Hughes, professor of law at New York University, is the author of The Conscience of the Courts (Doubleday). He has practiced criminal law in federal and New York State courts and is a frequent commentator on subjects related to criminal justice.

       ESCAPE OF THE GUILTY
       Ralph Adam Fine
       New York: Dodd, Mead, 1986
       272 pp., $17.95
       
        If there's anyone worse than criminals, it must be those who run the criminal justice system. At least that's the message that the media has been sending us for some years. Judges, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and court officials are all apparently locked in some great conspiracy to let criminals get away with their crimes and launch fresh assaults on innocent citizens. These media attacks do not explain why all these officials and lawyers should have such absurd or malevolent goals. Are they all unutterably stupid? Or hopelessly wrong-headed in their policies? Totally lazy and inefficient, perhaps? Every commentator points to the obvious remedy - bad and dangerous people should be put in prison for a long time. Why on earth doesn't this happen?
       
        Ralph Fine, a lawyer who has been a journalist and a television program host and is now a circuit judge in Wisconsin, has written a lively, well-informed, and entertaining book offering a fresh review of the iniquities of our criminal justice system. He examines several features that he takes to be central to the system's failure. The chief of these, to which he devotes a large part of his book, is the practice of plea bargaining. This is good place to start since nobody has a good word to say about plea bargaining, but hardly anyone does anything about it.
       
        Plea Bargaining
       
        Plea bargaining refers to a system under which, in return for pleading guilty, the defendant receives some reward. This may be a reduction in the level of the charge against him, perhaps including dropping the possibility of filing additional charges - charge bargains. Or, it may take the form of a promise by a judge to impose a particular sentence, or an agreement by a prosecutor to make a favorable recommendation on a sentence - sentence bargains. In a large number of cases this means that the defendant will serve no prison time at all, except for the time he may have been confined while awaiting disposition of his case.
       
        The evils of plea bargaining are well documented by Fine. The practice leads to sentences that often seem unrelated to the gravity of the offense committed, allowing dangerous offenders to be released immediately or much too soon. The system may also pressure the innocent into
... Read Full Article


Look for this article in Ask.com

Copyright © 2004 The World & I. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy